Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (19113)	5/13/1999 9:14:00 AM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

I thought you were a Republican. Isn't that the same as being a conspiracy theorist?

To: jlallen who wrote (19113)	5/13/1999 9:18:00 AM
From: Tom Frederick	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Mr. Allen, Carlo does make an interesting case. The main hole I see in any conspiracy theory - meaning that some entity wishes to deliberately hinder or stop any progress made by Naxos... - is that whoever would be behind it had the perfect setting in which to accomplish the goal of shutting down Naxos. The ASC hearings could have resulted in a ruling against Naxos effectively closing their doors. All that would need be done is have a few well placed "informers" some "tainted samples" etc. etc. and the case would have been an open and shut ruling against Naxos. The exoneration of Naxos, for me anyway, was a signal that there is no well conceived, coordinated effort in the form of a conspiracy, to shut down Naxos. The Ledoux fiasco will never be explained well enough to satisfy our need for a clear answer. But to tell you the truth, if Naxos can prove up an economically viable property with whatever PM's may be there, at that point Ledoux would be the last issue on my mind. Tom F.