SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tim Luke who wrote (39564)5/13/1999 12:11:00 PM
From: MrThesp  Respond to of 90042
 
<edit...removed post...can't verify.>



To: Tim Luke who wrote (39564)5/13/1999 12:12:00 PM
From: Glenn  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90042
 
A new IPO is coming out today that makes dsl.
That should be one to watch. Compunet or something like that.
If someone knows the symbol, would you post it?
Thanks,
Glenn



To: Tim Luke who wrote (39564)5/13/1999 12:13:00 PM
From: MARU CAT  Respond to of 90042
 
Yep - The stock should have dived otherwise on the day that it was discovered a fraudulent page.

Also, this stock keeps going, and going, and going.

Plus, didn't PAIR come out with less than expected earnings? And the stock kept up.

JMO
MARUCAT

Wish I had more PAIR!



To: Tim Luke who wrote (39564)5/13/1999 12:14:00 PM
From: AUrush  Respond to of 90042
 
Tim, thought a lot about it..

generally employees DO HAVE SIGNS of an impending buyout - but I am weary about that bogus letter, as a matter of fact, it is kinda a black cloud for me about PAIR and why I am not quite so hot to get in at any price - I cannot figure out why he would do it other than maybe he did see signs, loaded up on the stock, stock went down and caused a lot of personel preesure, figured he would help the price and that the truth maybe wasn't that far off anyway



To: Tim Luke who wrote (39564)5/13/1999 12:20:00 PM
From: LakesideTrader  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90042
 
Hi Tim, a lot of us have wondered about that. Check back on the thread speculation. I picked up more shares that day under 9 and have not regretted it. :-)



To: Tim Luke who wrote (39564)5/13/1999 12:26:00 PM
From: MrThesp  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90042
 
Never mind my first response, Tim...

I thought ECILF had denied talks but can't find any reference to that. PAIR simply stated “We have not announced an agreement with them.”

Not exactly a denial, eh?

Paul {:-)



To: Tim Luke who wrote (39564)5/13/1999 12:26:00 PM
From: T L Comiskey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90042
 
T...where there's smoke there's fire....T



To: Tim Luke who wrote (39564)5/13/1999 12:26:00 PM
From: JeffA  Respond to of 90042
 
PAIR - TIM LUKE!

I think the guy knew something. The price is right for what we think of as the price to buy PAIR around $20. But as far as ECI? I dunno. I think they denied strong enough to put that to bed.

MHO of course!

-Jeff



To: Tim Luke who wrote (39564)5/13/1999 1:53:00 PM
From: Bob  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90042
 
question to the thread regarding PAIR::::

have any of you wondered about that knuckle head from pair (who put out the bogus press release about pair being bought) if he really knew something ?
Well, yea I've been wondering.........

Message 8941198

Message 8941264

Message 8971686