Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Vennix who wrote (19151)	5/13/1999 4:57:00 PM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Alan, J/L made the same claims of richness of ore on FL that they are now making on MG property. There are many here on this thread who heard it directly from them, many more thatn that who heard it from their owner Matt Walters. they made all the claims of richness of ore and of their process. They are doing the same thing now, just changing the names on the script...... Mark After making all the claims, when they were finally backed into 3rd party verification, by an expert of their choice, they failed miserably. rumor has it that they did try to claim the reason that blanks came back with numbers was that they were recovering gold from the blanks, LOL!!!!! Mark

To: Alan Vennix who wrote (19151)	5/13/1999 5:13:00 PM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

that is right Alan, Bryon Russell concluded that attriting had no beneficial effects on the process when used on Naxos' ore. We don't know what the impact on MGAU's ore is because he did not analyze. But then again there has been no independent third party analysis or verification of the J/L process on MGAU's ore, has there? J/L likes it like that, it protects their intellectual property. <VBG> keep one thing in mind Alan, that hand in your pocket may not be your own.