Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (8335)	5/13/1999 9:12:00 PM
From: D. Long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 17770

Agreed that we have to think through incentives. One of the biggest failures of the current welfare system is that encourages free-riding. If you can maintain an adequate lifestyle on the dole, why assume responsibility for one's self? I read one figure which stated that we could give each and every individual currently on the dole a check for 15000 dollars every year, and still have approximately 100 billion left over from the budgeted expenditures. The current scheme is corrupt to say the least. It rewards laziness and penalizes if you honestly just need that little extra bit to carry one over. The answers inevitably come down to social expectations, and trying to restore personal responsibility. My grandfather was dirt poor, with twelve kids, and went on the dole in the late 40's. As late as 1988, before he died, he would still get sheepish with humiliation that he had to do so for only a few months. Today, the expectations are different, and many see no shame in surrendering responsibility for themselves for the luxury of watching Oprah 24/7.