To: Binx Bolling who wrote (5711 ) 5/14/1999 9:29:00 AM From: Ausdauer Respond to of 60323
Binx, First, I don't believe the purpose of the CFA is to do any PR for CompactFlash as a medium, but to serve as a central governing body for approval of new products or companies planning to utilize CFA (or the CFA emblem) and to delineate the specifications for CFA qualification. For example, Lexar may petition the CFA to include a USB standard. Second, I don't believe the CFA could afford to advertise even if they wanted to. Third, I don't believe that SanDisk employees or any employees of any publicly owned company are allowed to post on message boards. As I said yesterday, Eli's plan to use major corporate endorsements like those from Kodak, Nikon, RCA, Casio and the like has merit. I certainly would favor more publicity via those channels (a box front insignia acknowledging SanDisk ("SanDisk Inside"), a mention of SanDisk in the user's manual regarding memory upgrades, a gift certificate in a product box for a discount on an ImageMate purchase from SanDisk, a generic guide/flyer/pamphlet on the use of CF cards in consumer electronics products,...). Also, some ignoramus at Ritz camera told me that the Epson camera I bought used "smart cards" for removable memory. When I asked about upgrades he told me it was as thin as a credit card and that they sold them at Ritz. He then showed me a SmartMedia card. I was really hot under the collar at that point. The retailers could do a lot more educating of sales people when it comes time for Joe Consumer to plunk down $400 or $600 or $800 or $1000 for a new digital camera. How about warning people about forward compatibility problems with SmartMedia? How about plugging the advantages of CompactFlash's portability between devices/platforms such as PDA's, mp3 players and the like? Don't retailers have a duty to serve their consumers in the best possible manner? Ausdauer