Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. De Paul who wrote (3715)	5/14/1999 2:05:00 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12823

Maybe that's so for the time being. I'm sure there's something else at play here as well. They are no one's fool. They are also trying to avoid the acceleration of further erosion to what would otherwise be potentially higher future profits. They are doing this, preserving, where they can, the one model that favors the carrier model that they know best. The one that works with no questions asked. Without taking any unnecessary arrows in the back. But I do believe that this will leave them prey for future virtual platform attack, more so than if they took a modified, or optioned approach at this time. They can do this if they chose by providing both capabilities, leaving the subscriber with a choice to make, or to choose both. Cornerstone, I believe, appears capable of supporting this kind of duality, if I'm not mistaken. Denver, Mike, jump in here if need be...