Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hui zhou who wrote (8382)	5/14/1999 3:22:00 PM
From: Les H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17770

You're misleading since you know full well that Clinton and DNC accepted far more money before FEC forced them to give some of the money back. I don't confuse China with the Chinese Communists. Much of the problem with Tibet and Formosa has arisen since the Communists took over, especially with their version of "Russification" to quell dissent.

To: hui zhou who wrote (8382)	5/14/1999 8:05:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 17770

Don't forget your CIA funded thousands tax payer's dollars to illegal organization, such as China Democratic Party, and other "human rights fighters". As opposed to Chinese direct and indirect support N. Vietnam, Cambodia, Pathet Lao, Sendero Luminoso (Peru)... Where do these people get all of these Chinese arms anyway?? Even Dalai Lama was on CIA payroll for years Hmmm... well I don't that.. But he was spirited out of Tibet after the Chinese invasion with the support of the newly created CIA (formerly OSS). Btw, who was responsible for providing the support and weaponry to Mao forces in the first place? Was than an illegal activity on the part of the Soviets?? Blame is like a big wheel... it just goes round and round and round. The issue is whether modern gov'ts have the resolve to stop the endless cycle and work towards peace, as well as enforce it, together. Thus far, I'm slightly underwhelmed by Bejing's and Moscow's enthusiasm for creating stability instead of instability. Regards, Ron