SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kapkan4u who wrote (58190)5/15/1999 3:17:00 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1571898
 
<So you think it makes more sense for Intel to weaken AMD until a stronger company acquires them? How will then Intel have easier time with K7 produced by TI or IBM? Please explain.>

I don't think things will be much different if some big company like IBM acquires them. It's not like IBM is a sure success anyway. Look at how the PowerPC floundered even as Motorola, Apple, and IBM all collaborated on this old "Pentium-killer".

Besides, why would some company like IBM acquire AMD if AMD is weakened by brutal competition? Even if the acquisition price were extremely low, it would still be a money-losing proposition.

By the way, has anyone bought Cyrix from National Semiconductor yet? Or is Cyrix just going to enter oblivion except in the virtual microcontroller market?

Tenchusatsu



To: kapkan4u who wrote (58190)5/15/1999 10:39:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571898
 
KalKan4U - Re: "How will then Intel have easier time with K7 produced by TI or IBM? Please explain."

Now there's a joke !

Ever hear of IBM's "BLUE LIGHTNING" or TI's "Rivers Project" ?

Intel beat the pants off BOTH IBM and TI in x86 production - YEARS AGO !

They both KNOW IT and are smart enough NOT TO GO UP against Intel again.

Read some CPU history - maybe you'll learn a thing ot three.

Paul