Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PolyMet Mining Corp POM.V (was Fleck Resources) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (658)	5/15/1999 4:27:00 PM
From: Pete Mimmack	Respond to of 708

Elizabeth - I doubt Shaun's analysis has changed since last fall when you went at him. Try reviewing his posts from then. If he is gracious enough to go thru it again now, more power to him. Oh, and the concentrate that they did the pressurized oxidation on was actually 40:1, not 25:1 as they had obtained earlier, so that should make the POX costs lower. The actual costs are not yet known, at least not publicly, and will certainly be a key point in advancing the project. In addition, here's someone who did crunch some of the numbers: Message 6486948 .

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (658)	5/17/1999 12:36:00 PM
From: Shaun M. Dykes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 708

Elizabeth we went through this back in January nothing has changed. Please read previous posts. In the last months the testing has confirmed the second metal recovery method(pressure oxidization) , havent seen the results from the updated bacterial leach test, yet. The way I see it, the property is progressing. I like to short stocks just like everything else, but what I dont like is people trying to artificially create the short. In todays mining industry we dont need this, its just as bad as over hyping a property. Let the facts speak for themselves.