Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Fatty's Donut Shop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Selfmade$ who wrote (1219)	5/15/1999 2:59:00 PM
From: WEBNATURAL	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5041

The board is exceptionally quiet. I think they are waiting for someone to start the discussion. Initial thoughts...The numbers are as we thought...higher initial revenues. Way higher and appear to be growing faster than posted on the revenue graph. Earnings were nil before and visible now. Was not the company to be earning in late 1999 - not early 1999? 1st earnings? Annualized = 1.9 million right off the bat. Was not expected till end of 1999? Revenues up and they are giving "$50.00" for each person signing in for "1st" time at casino. Just started building a casino base and the growing process and making a profit already. Downside is - is it enough or do we wait for more profit - more revenue to buy stock? Would you buy more Monday and would you pay more for the stocks at the next report? Friday numbers = "good" news such as I see it. This news from the company is for digesting and planning for the next week. If released Monday there would be no time to think and react to the stock price for investors. Week-end study should give new and existing investors an opportunity to plan their next purchases and (for some) sell possibilities. Friday was the proper time for these numbers. There are no 'negatives' in the news unless one should re-word and re-use it to buy more shares at a lower price. This is one perspective and there should be a counter perspective to this view. That's one positive view in the debate. We need a view for the other side of the discussion. The floor is open for good active discussion.