Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCH Technologies (DCH) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (1471)	5/15/1999 4:22:00 PM
From: Scoobah	Respond to of 2513

You should have read more closely, WARNING: Trading in DCHT can be hazardous to your health. If you are short, you will soon die. This stock is not recommended for the squeamish and those that can't stomach a little volatility as we take this stock away from the weak, and place it gently into the hands of the strong.

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (1471)	5/15/1999 4:27:00 PM
From: Scoobah	Respond to of 2513

Jack, the Feb 8, 1999 date applies there too. I was hoping for more than that from you and your professed superior intelligence.

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (1471)	5/15/1999 4:33:00 PM
From: Scoobah	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2513

Seeing the name SirAlexx back in lights almost brings a tear to my eye. Thanks for the return to more fun days on SI. Life was a lot simpler then; especially when anonymity was good for all, something the lot of your recent posts fails to consider.

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (1471)	5/15/1999 4:47:00 PM
From: Scoobah	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2513

Francois, I got you thrown off raging Bull, didn't I. That's why Francois Goelo is gone and you're now posting as Sweet Dreams. We'll soon see if you provided the correct personal information to Raging Bull when you opened your account. We'll also soon know if you did the same for SI. Raging Bull understands the wastefulness of bad publicity and other non recurrable costs to defend tort actions; SI, ( Go2Net) is next. Message 9545815 To: C M Burns (1777 ) From: Francois Goelo Saturday, May 15 1999 3:13PM ET Reply # of 1781 I am sure you're poor but young & attractive and women swarm all over you... As for the SEC, I am in regular communication with them, as I have brought several individuals and Companies to their attention and will always be at their disposal, should they wish to interview me. You see, I don't fear the Law, as I have always lived a clean and completely honest life, whether you believe it or not. F. Goelo + + + Your failure to fear the law is your mistake. The law you see, is for all of us. Francois you are a weed that is about to be pulled from the garden.

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (1471)	5/15/1999 5:35:00 PM
From: trader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2513

Sid, Its still quite difficult to see conclusive "evidence" or "proof" of any such lies or fraud. Like I stated before Im curious to see developments soon, as the conversation as piqued my interest in the subject, however, I am not in a position to speak doom and gloom for the company at this point due to partial information you post. FG, I dont understand why you need to make it your business to protect me from what I stated above "inconclusive data and information" (obviously not fact, proof or evidence). In the event I decide not to invest based on your opinions (failing to tell me what you have seen here is strictly opinion and based on observations with limited facts) and the opinions you stress are inacurate due to limited information and facts given to you by your sources, the stock may rise to much higher levels. I may want to sue you for your false data provided by you to me since you and Sid continue to misrepresent yourself as having obtained evidence and proof!!!!! I guess you better be careful in how you attempt to protect the innocent, ignorant, and poor from harms way!!!! FG and Sid, good luck and keep your little noses clean from misrepresentation!!!