Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mr. Pink's Picks: selected event-driven value investments -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Pink who wrote (8594)	5/15/1999 6:26:00 PM
From: Kimberly Lee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18998

As I said repeatedly, I traded XSNI mostly from the technical point of view. Did not mention one word about the company in any of my write ups. I have had great success with trading volatile bb stocks this way (besides, how much can you trust the bb companies "fundamentals" anyway? Most of them are non-reporting and many of the CEOs lie, come on, you know that) exchange2000.com Where did I mention a word about XSNI the COMPANY in any of my posts?

To: Mr. Pink who wrote (8594)	5/15/1999 6:33:00 PM
From: Wayne Rumball	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18998

LOL OTC BB The fact that they have a working phone # is better than most. They are all scams, I will be the first to say it. But who's scam is better than the other guy's... AOL is overvalued, so why not someone else's scam? Junk, Junk, Junk, they are all junk Why pick on XSNI, why not EVIS, or DWNS, or IGHS, or WOWS, or NGLD..... Which scam is the biggest scam? Who knows, just trying to make money in the OTC junk yard