Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldsnow who wrote (33987)	5/16/1999 1:32:00 PM
From: Alex	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116823

5/14/99 - Gold"s role needs to be re-evaluated <Picture> Johannesburg (Mail and Guardian, May 14, 1999) - Gold, the precious metal most commonly associated with = South Africa, is in the way of taking yet a further beating after the Uni= ted Kingdom"s Chancellor, Gordon Brown, announced last week that Britain = is to sell off about 415 tons over the next three years. An extraordinary aspect of the British announcement was the way it del= ivered its decision. Most central banks which decide to reduce significan= tly their bullion reserves announce this after they"ve made their sales (= as Australia did two years ago). All the Bank of England has done is to drive down the price of the ver= y commodity it now hopes to sell, presumably at good prices. In its defen= ce, some commentators say that at least the UK sales by auction will be t= ransparent. I cannot, for the life of me, see what good that does. If, for some pe= rverse reasoning, the bank thinks it clever to deny taxpayers $10 an ounc= e (roughly the extent to which the gold price has fallen since the Britis= h announcement) it will certainly get its wish. Ten dollars an ounce may = not sound much but over 415 tons it amounts to something like a cool $135= -million. South Africans need to be concerned because of the primary role gold m= ining continues to play as an employer of labour. At its apogee in 1986, = the industry employed 534 000 personnel. Since then, and as gold"s role h= as been steadily reduced, so much of South Africa"s production has become= uneconomic. As production fell, so did the labour force needed to mine i= t. By 1997, the labour force had shrunk to 321 000. Economists believe every man employed in the mines effectively support= s a further 10 people, either indirectly in the rural areas or through th= e secondary industries which have grown up around the various gold fields= . Presuming that"s correct, the cold statistics mean that over the past t= wo decades more than two million people have had to find sustenance from = some source other than gold mining. In a country in which job destruction= and economic contraction are commonplace, this is where the real pain ha= s had to be absorbed, not in fancy numbers or in economic theory but in t= he reality of poverty. And, given the state of the market, it"s hard to see how it will recov= er. Over the past 10 years the grip of the bears has steadily tightened. = Central bankers, who really should know better, have allowed their stock = of bullion to be used for lease purposes on the flimsy pretext that it"s = better to earn 2,5% from a silent asset than nothing. What none of them a= dmit publicly, however, is these loans have contributed to bullion"s stea= dy price decline. And of what value can it possibly be to earn a pittance= on the income statement while the asset"s value in the balance sheet fal= ls by $40 an ounce or more? What is now needed is a complete about-face in the way gold"s role in = commerce is measured and understood. We all know that gold remains a stor= e of (declining) value. We also know its role as a monetary instrument ha= s been steadily debased over the last decade (except when it suits the me= rchant bankers for whom its cheapness and ease of access has become legen= dary). Gold Fields chair Chris Thompson, who takes grave exception to the man= ner in which gold"s supply and demand patterns are measured, believes new= methods of evaluating gold"s role are urgently necessary. As an example, American housing stock (about 95-million units), like g= old, has a vast store above ground. Like gold, this stock is added to eve= ry year (about 500 000 new houses annually in the United States). And, li= ke bullion, property and land are perceived to be permanent stores of val= ue. Gold needs to be reassessed along similar lines. The long term transfer of gold from central bank to private ownership = really should not come as any great surprise (most gold is already held p= rivately). Yet there seems a pervasive fear, fuelled happily by gold bear= s, that the 30 000 tons in national treasuries (most of it in the US, Fre= nch and German central banks) will be released in a deluge. There"s not much chance of that but as long as the threat remains, so = gold will stay trapped in a relentless price decline. This isn"t helped e= ither by producers who hedge out sales of their future production, in som= e cases by as much as 12 years ahead. It may give short-term succour and = make some mines appear illusorily profitable, but it is really slow-actin= g poison because all it really achieves is to make increasing quantities = of unmined gold uneconomic. I know what I urge is easier said than done and may appear a pious wis= h, but producers need to put their differences aside and devise a long-te= rm strategy which stands the industry on its head and enables it, after y= ears of debilitating price contractions, to expand. Failure to do so mean= s another decade of shafts closing, falling output and ever fewer jobs. By David Gleason ( Column) Copyright 1999 Mail and Guardian. Distributed via Africa News Online.