Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: leigh aulper who wrote (36214)	5/16/1999 2:09:00 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Oh, I have little doubt that a potential delisting factored into it somewhere. Isn't it ironic, though, that just after the reverse split the stock spikes high enough to make the reverse split unnecessary. Assuming the current price holds, of course. Also interesting is the timing of the name change to fall just a few days after the reverse split. Almost, one might think, as if to camouflage the split from some of the less sophisticated charting services. The choice of new name is odd, too. Funny how they should pick a name that is almost exactly that of a private company that starts making significant headlines in the tech pages less than a week later. A lot of coincidences there, don't you think? Trouble is, not everyone believes in coincidences.