Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Andrew H who wrote (28271)	5/16/1999 12:25:00 PM
From: The Swordsman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44908

Gordon and everyone else have been seriously miscalculating the price of this stock for many months now. IMO, the burden of proof is not on those like myself who are skeptical of much higher prices but rather on those who are and have been predicting a substantially higher stock price. For months I have been hearing how the revenues were going to be flowing in and the BR deal was going to produce 50M in revenues this year alone. I am still waiting. As for rumored deals, I have been hearing such rumors for about 6 months now and the great majority have failed to materialize. If Mr. Gordon has been selling any of his self granted stock from the past year into the float, all the while *miscalculating* as defined in your above statement, then I believe that there may be a better word to use than *miscalculating.* For further clarity please see my last post. Message 9550513 SC

To: Andrew H who wrote (28271)	5/16/1999 1:26:00 PM
From: Suzanne Newsome	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Andrew, IMO being wrong is not the same thing as hyping. Gordon was definitely wrong about his predictions for the stock price for this spring. OTOH, would you have predicted the stock would be at $.21 knowing all the announcements that have been made? You certainly have the right to take a "wait-and-see" attitude. If Gordon predicts often enough, he will have to be right eventually. <g> Regards, Suzanne

To: Andrew H who wrote (28271)	5/17/1999 9:52:00 AM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44908

Andrew, that's just about the longest post I've seen you make! <G> It's also a very reasoned post, IMHO. I see the posts about being on the NASDAQ in the 4th quarter and I cringe. The revenues that were projected to be realized by May became June and now it's October if I recall correctly. Remember that commercial that said "Where's the beef?" Well, that's what needs to be seen. While the Babe Ruth League deal is great and serves a very worthwhile purpose for the boys who play, I never believed $50M would be seen from it. No way. Not in one or two years together even. Maybe cumulatively after a number of years, but not this year. I also happen to agree that, as of this date, the Signature deal is the closest to producing revenue. There have been some fairly tall rumors floating about. I'd like to see just one of them come to fruition. Just one. Then I think my frustrations will be eased. The business plan is what has kept me here. But let's see some results, some revenue. Or Robert Gordon removing that revolving credit agreement or re-pricing its conversion. As far as Hwang and his division, I do realize they're just getting up and running so I personally am willing to allow time to see what they accomplish. I think that - for me - is what really keeps me here just now. The other night, on CNN, there was a brief story about IBM - Gerstner talked about their plans for providing "ecommerce solutions" and it was nearly exactly the same plan/ideas as laid out for Hwang's division. I think that division of TSIG may be at the right place at the right time. We'll see what they come up with. Well, I'm rambling... Anyway, I for one appreciated your post.