SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 50% Gains Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LANCE B who wrote (6149)5/16/1999 1:22:00 PM
From: Dale BakerRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 118717
 
I can't argue with the exposure. Hopefully some of those people will continue to return to tigerinvestor.com regularly.

This all boils down to the fact that XSNI was good for your style, but it didn't meet my criteria. All I did was repeat what was posted and what I found when I applied my research techniques. The fact that you played XSNI and I didn't says a lot about our styles.

I get people spamming BB stocks here all the time. Most of the time I don't follow up on what happens. I this case I did because I watched XSNI for an entry on Friday then kept it on my L2 list the next week to watch it go down (as I expected). For the record, anyone who drops a stock symbol on this thread with a vague promise "it's going up" is spamming - again that's my definition.

Do it on more than two threads and it fits SI's definition.

I'm glad your group is making money. I don't agree with the way you do it. Obviously I have my own style which I chronicle here. I am concerned that you will make a lot of money off naive investors who don't know how to do proper research (maybe after my article they do now). I tend to make my money from people who buy value stocks or Internuts after I do. Almost nothing I hold is currently trading significantly lower than where I bought in. Which is more than you can say for anyone who bought XSNI since last Monday.

Good trading, lance.