To: fortitude who wrote (36230 ) 5/16/1999 8:41:00 PM From: fortitude Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
Let me guess! Smart Money? You are had, blatant lie, given my above fact regarding reposting of SI URL's, none other then a current SI member could have cut and pasted the SI link of 5:06 PM by Barronio, onto RB at 5:09 by Smart Money. And, their are too many commonalities between the posts made on RB and Yahoo between the posts I've already given, and what's on the SCII RB thread, for a coincidence. You are digging a very large hole for yourself. I will be forwarding to the SEC an even stronger case of the matter. I would expect that RB, SI, and Yahoo, will be able to provide them with the specific identities of the posters in question to see if in fact what I suppose is true. I understand you are short SCII, that has nothing to do with this investigation. Monday AM, I'll be adding to the file that began by uncovering what you scammed up for profiteering on Friday. You may continue to lie, but it has become openly obvious as to the truth of the matter now. ..................................................................... Smart Money on RB: By: Smart_Money Reply To: None Friday, 14 May 1999 at 5:09 PM EDT Post # of 257 See link www3.techstocks.com ...................................................................... (who's the link?) In 3 minute's, Barronio. ...................................................................... To: leigh aulper (183 ) From: Barronio Friday, May 14 1999 5:06PM ET Reply # of 188 I have nothing against the company... but stocks don't normally double after a 5:1 reverse split. The more I think about it the more convinced I am that SCII is getting a free ride off the other company's PR. I will have to look into it more. ... ..................................................................... File-SEC Equity Investigation: Barronio/Smart Money