Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (58324)	5/16/1999 10:36:00 PM
From: Gary Ng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574098

Paul, Re: where at 500 MHz, the K7 should dissipate over 60 Watts - as per "intelligent estimates" ! I hope you are kidding. Gary

To: Paul Engel who wrote (58324)	5/16/1999 10:51:00 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574098

Paul, I would assume this will be at least 2.4 volts , where at 500 MHz, the K7 should dissipate over 60 Watts - as per "intelligent estimates" ! You are doing some serious reaching for FUD these days. Scumbria

To: Paul Engel who wrote (58324)	5/16/1999 11:18:00 PM
From: kash johal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574098

Paul, Re: "Personally, I expect AMD to actually use 2.5 volts on their 550 or 600 MHz parts - which will be 100% burned in for Oxide Break Down - prior to shipments." I agree with the 2.5V. I suspect the 60W power assumption may be a tad high. BTW does Intel not perform 100% burn-in to weed out infant mortality?? Regards, Kash

To: Paul Engel who wrote (58324)	5/17/1999 12:14:00 AM
From: Mani1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574098

Paul Re <<the K7 should dissipate over 60 Watts - as per "intelligent estimates" !>> Even if true, there is nothing wrong with that. K7 is not intended for the mobile market. At least any time soon. Mani