Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCH Technologies (DCH) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (1538)	5/17/1999 3:00:00 AM
From: Dan B.	Respond to of 2513

Same with the hundred years error I made. :-) EOM

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (1538)	5/17/1999 5:59:00 AM
From: Dan B.	Respond to of 2513

Actually, since 1528 doesn't touch any of the information Oshinsky provides in your reposting of of his tout in 1530, you've shown nothing implausible in his tout- not that their might not be implausible things there. When the day comes, for instance, that we find that Haberman never talked to G.M. and Ford and was made to feel his sensors would be wanted in future fuelcell vehicles both by OEM and government requirements, that Westinghouse never put DCHT sensors in a nuke in Russia, that Freewing(with Burt Rutan aboard) isn't really plotting to use DCHT fuel cells in it's attempt to get government contracts for its unmanned planes, that the DCHT sensors didn't really fly on the space shuttle, that Allied Signal isn't really putting DCHT product into NASA's new rockets for Lockheed Martin and never really made a chip for DCHT and isn't really preparing to produce anything for sale with DCHT technology in it, there is no ongoing research in association with the DOE, Xybernaut isn't really going to try to sell DCHT sensors combined with it's wearable computers, Ballard isn't using a single DCHT sensor, DCHT doesn't really have a backlog of orders(how much???) for safety and process monitoring from a potential market of over 200 industries and isn't really going into full scale production this year, DCHT chairman Haberman isn't really a member of the Hydrogen Technical Advisory Panel which reports to congress regarding appropriations, DCHT managers don't really come from backgrounds with RCA Aerospace, Rockwell, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Aeronautics Corp. of America, General Instruments,and Motorola, DCHT hasn't really been partly supported with loans from corporate officers(how much???), the float isn't really under 4 million as of Mar. 27, 1999 with outstanding at 14 million, and etc. (I could actually go on with more of this), then I'll think this company isn't a good bet. Here's a post from the thread of little BB outfit with a technology developed at a National Laboratory. Some folks think this may make them a lot of money. Check out the dilution on THIS one combined with the POSSIBILITY they will fINALLY produce a one of their intended products(electronic highway bulletinboards on the cheap)SOMETIME???...they are 8 cents a share. I don't and never have owned any. An independent web site recommends them as a potential near term "3-bagger". They have an order and as I recall have received some of the money from the customer already just so they could start building it---think about THAT in relation to DCHT and it's perceived money woes. Message 9327442 "I hear ya Steve: Dilution is needed for these development stage companies, BUT, when I first bought ADOT in Aug 97, they had only 6M shares out and traded between $0.50 and $0.80 and were promising the first BB by March 1998. I have seen the dilution now go 5 fold and my original share price drop by at least 80%. That means that my original investment is now worth about 25 times less than when I started buying into this Company. We have all been strung along now with the first BB promise date of 3/98 now being 9/99 at the earliest. I have averaged down only because I BELIEVE that the technology is valid and that current management will succeed. I hope that I am right. Still long! ;>)" He may be a winner in this stock Francios. Here's a bit of what what 3bagger.com says about them. 3bagger.com "The stock is trading at about .08 cents. What would it take to make that stock jump in value? Remember that everything is only 'perceived'. If (ADOT) was to begin the actual sale of these units in let's say, two months, then would you want to buy the stock right now? Of course. The reason being that you are basically betting that they will in fact be selling these and people will want to buy them. Your 'intuition' tells you that this company's product could be a big hit with the public. Therfore you are willing to give them your money - the money they need - to get these things off the ground. Your payback is the potential higher stock price. The gamble you are taking is that they right now - the time you actually are investing - don't have any real customers or revenues because they don't have a product to sell. It could be that they never actually get that far for any number of reasons and the company simply goes out of business. That is why you have to do your homework. But if you are right, and you get in at the right time - BEFORE they start to sell the product they have spent so long producing - then the payoff could really be HUGE." Well, from what I understand about the Billboards they want to build, they really could do GREAT! Still, I say that FEW BB stocks have real product and existing customers and prospects anything CLOSE to the likes of what DCHT has. I think this DCHT outfit is a really good bet. JMHO