To: Joe Lyddon who wrote (7039 ) 5/17/1999 2:24:00 PM From: Rande Is Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57584
Pretty close, Joe. . .I think it will spike all the way back to its old support levels between 11 and 14, but rather than waiting for "exactly" that level. . .I would start watching carefully at 17. . .if it looked like it could keep going, I'd hold off and grab the super cheap . . Generally, I think it will establish a new support level above the old [which was established on very low volume]. . .probably between 17 and 20. . . all of this is contingent on it breaking thru 25, where it has recently seen major support on heavy volume. . . however that was when the Inet market was strong and there was plenty of volume in daily trading. . . The fall of Inets this spring/summner is on VERY low volume. . .making all the difference. . . I think we see these stocks breaking thru old support levels [like SIEB at 25] over time, due to general high-tech weakness, similarly to this time last year. Don't anyone get me wrong. . I am not 'wishing' a Bear market. . . nobody in their right mind would. . .not even the bears. . .only those that have never experienced one. I am rather 'predicting' a bear summer. . .based on what I believe has been a broad market bear that started about the beginning of the year. . . with several small bulls running separately within the bear market. . . [high-techs, internets, cyclicals] . . .seperate and unattached. . . remove those mini-bulls from your charts and you get a totally new picture of the market in 1999 so far. . [anyone want to create some charts to demonstrate this theory?] I don't believe that current Dow, Nasdaq composite or S and P indexes are effective in demonstrating what is really happening in today's market. A/D lines, the Russell indexes, high-tech indexes and others must be viewed as they impact one another and how they compare to the S and P, Dow, Nasdaq 50, 100, etc. Frankly, there is no current index that truly can indicate the changing dynamics of this current market. And that's why sometimes I sound like I am coming out of left field somewhere with a wild seemingly unsupported prediction. Rande Is