SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Cents and Sensibility - Kimberly and Friends' Consortium -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (5123)5/17/1999 3:48:00 PM
From: Frederick Langford  Respond to of 108040
 
Another classy move, Anthony. You never fail to amaze me. Best of luck with your new site <g>

Fred



To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (5123)5/17/1999 3:49:00 PM
From: jimmy  Respond to of 108040
 
NUOA +35% spread .0425-.049. It's closing strong. Looking for a gap up
tomorrow.

jimmy



To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (5123)5/17/1999 6:32:00 PM
From: Kimberly Lee  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108040
 
Anthony, thanks, much indebted. Still much in awe of the great work you did in war torn former Yugoslavia and much delighted to witness your trading prowess back home here.

You know, I agree that HITT, SHAL, MUCP can be scams, but one must make distinctions between investments and trading vehicles. I invest in CSCO, MSFT, LU and the likes, for a few years now, and as long as the fundamentals don't change, I will stay in those investments for much longer.

As a matter of fact, I made money nearly every time I trade HITT. HITT is a scam, yes, but in that specific trading episode, I was there merely to take advantage of directional movements of the stock, exploiting the intraday temporary imbalances in supply/demand, greed/fear, hype/bash. It was strictly a trading vehicle, a 25 minutes profitable trade, nothing more and nothing less. The moment I found out it's a true scam, I published the following post at 5:30am the next morning to warn the readers of my thread.
exchange2000.com

the whole thing involves a series of misunderstandings ......

thanks again,
Kimberly