Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCH Technologies (DCH) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scoobah who wrote (1558)	5/17/1999 7:20:00 PM
From: Francois Goelo	Respond to of 2513

Why don't you explain your actions, as described in post #1528 and... reconcile the three points made from posts available on the Web: 1) The date of 23 December 1998 for the filing by RAM Capital of Form 144 for 100,000 DCHT shares. 2) The report, dated 15 January 1999, showing in the disclaimer that Ram Capital paid to promoter, Research Investment Group, 50,000 shares of DCHT. 3) Your "confession" on RB where you say that DCHT's Haberman hired you in December 1998. with your published statement that you received compensation of 100,000 shares on 8 February 1999 (for the first time, one would assume). Now those would be the actions of an honorable person who has done nothing wrong, instead those of a crazy man running around various threads, foaming at the mouth with threats of groundless lawsuits. I understand that when the odds appear to turn against you, the only course of action you see fit, is to attack, threaten and attempt to intimidate the messenger, thus confirming how you're perceived by many on this Board. F. Goelo + + +

To: Scoobah who wrote (1558)	5/20/1999 6:41:00 PM
From: StockDung	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2513

Unfortunately for you the Security laws require full disclosure, especially the insiders and promoters. The average person has to disclose nothing. But since you are a insider with Ram Capital Management, a promoter, the law clearly states you must post your compensation. Here is a list. It may help you in the future. Just ask Notorious Steve Samblis who recently went into a Florida Federal District Court with a newspaper over his face. (updated 3/9/99) Sponsored by WallStreet Guru stockdetective.com Important: Please Read Stock Detective Guide to Pseudo-Research and Phony Financial Reports - first Insufficient Disclosure - insufficient or no information at all is provided to allow the reader to determine that a fee was paid for the "story" or research. Blanket Disclosure - one disclaimer fits all the companies discussed in a publication or web site; reader is not informed whether the disclaimer applies to all, some or none of the companies Identifiable Disclosure - a disclaimer accompanies each story about a specifically identified stock; better than blanket disclosure but still falls short of the SEC required description of compensation Full Disclosure - individual disclaimers for each company profile, including the form and amount of all compensation received by the publisher; meets guidelines established in Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 N/A - disclosure information was not available to Stock Detective as of the date of the report

To: Scoobah who wrote (1558)	5/27/1999 5:44:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2513

You know, for a paid tout, you really should pay more attention to marketing. Your stupid legal threats and assertion that "all of SI is waiting" [to back you up] are not only incorrect, they are bad marketing. You assume to speak for "the entire SI audience"? Most of the SI audience doesn't pay attention to you or DCHT. You're high, dude. You don't speak for me. Not even close. If I were running the IR at DCHT, I'd fire your ass and hire somebody that understood how to promote.