SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jenna who wrote (40534)5/17/1999 7:53:00 PM
From: Tradelite  Respond to of 120523
 
A news item for INTC, AMD, and other chip investors. (plus, if I can remember which publication I saw it in today, I'll send a story about the growing use of internet banking.)
______________________
Intel launches fund to soup up software

By JACK SCHOFIELD
The Guardian

The personal computer industry is preparing a great leap forward that will more than double the power of computers. The problem is that there is hardly any software to exploit the extra capability.

To bridge this gap, Intel, the world's biggest chip maker, has just announced a $250 million fund to support the switch from 32-bit to 64-bit processors when the company delivers Merced, its first 64-bit IA (Intel Architecture) chip next year. The Intel 64 Fund (http://intel64fund.com) is being bankrolled by Compaq, Intel, Dell, NEC, SGI and Hewlett-Packard.

A dozen noncomputer companies - including Bank of America, Ford Motor, Reuters and SmithKline Beecham - are also contributing to the fund, which will be managed by venture capital investment company Morgan Stanley Dean Witter.

The last processor transition started in 1985 when Intel introduced the 32-bit 80386 to replace the 16-bit 286 chip used in the IBM PC AT (Advanced Technology).

However, it was not until Microsoft Windows 95 appeared a decade later that most users gained the benefits of 32-bit computing, and even that retains 16-bit operations for backwards compatibility. Intel hopes the $250m investment in 64-bit software will make the transition faster this time.

Microsoft is well advanced with the development of a 64-bit version of its next-generation Windows 2000 operating system, formerly known as Windows NT (New Technology). However, the Intel 64 Fund will target ''a full-range of volume operating systems,'' including Unix, which is the standard on the large server computers and high-powered graphics workstations where Intel's 64-bit chips will first come into use.

In this market, Intel's ideas are far from new. Workstations and servers started moving to 64-bit processing when Digital Equipment Corporation announced the Alpha, an advanced RISC (reduced instruction set computer) processor, in 1992. But the IA-64 fund's backers show the failure of the RISC processing revolution to kill Intel - one of the sillier articles of faith among some supporters of RISC chips used by companies like Acorn, Apple and IBM.

Hewlett-Packard, the first company to commercialize RISC, has been a co-developer of IA-64 chips, with which it plans to replace its own HP-PA (Precision Architecture) RISC chips.

SGI, formerly Silicon Graphics Incorporated, has floated off its RISC chip division, Mips, and switched to Intel. Digital was taken over by Compaq, the world's largest manufacturer of Intel-based PCs, and the Alpha is now made under contract by Intel.

Intel expects that Merced and the next IA-64 chip, code-named McKinley, will enable it to expand its share of the server and workstation businesses, where it is currently weak. Of course, this does not mean it has lost interest in the PC business. There will be a ''price point'' version of the IA-64, code-named Deerfield, for use in ordinary desktop computers.

Intel is also working hard to win back the low-cost PC market. Last year its market share fell from 85 percent to 76 percent, according to U.S.-based Mercury Research, as PC manufacturers adopted cheaper Pentium-compatible chips from AMD and Cyrix. But over the past six months, Intel has repeatedly cranked up the speed and slashed the price of the Celeron, its low-end version of the Pentium, to attack this market.

As a result, Brian Halla, chairman, president and chief executive of National Semiconductor, Cyrix's parent company, announced that it would immediately cease ''slugging it out'' in the PC-processor market.

''Believing that Intel would not and could not compete in the low-end [PC] space was a mistake,'' said Halla.

AMD is also struggling. In March the company said it was losing money and would lay off 300 workers. At its annual meeting on April 29, shareholders called for the resignation of Chairman and Chief Executive Jerry Sanders, who has run AMD for 30 years.




To: Jenna who wrote (40534)5/17/1999 8:06:00 PM
From: John M. Allen  Respond to of 120523
 
CREE finally moving. DSTR looking very strong here. Don't know if anyone is interested in Canadian issues but CII on the Vancouver exchange is about to take off big time, imo.; is also is on NASDAQ as CYPKF. Main holding is still NITE. Still looking at VRIO but is acting strangely. The 73 breakout seems far away right now. Luck to all.



To: Jenna who wrote (40534)5/17/1999 8:23:00 PM
From: Wallace Rivers  Respond to of 120523
 
This post will probably meet with a good degree of criticism, but I, for one, find it refreshing that an analyst has the courage to put out a SELL. That is a word that is almost non-existent on WS. Neither TBFC nor NTBK are cheap using most valuation measures, and, for once, this analyst may be saying what he truly feels, rather than being the mouthpiece of the investment banking dept. (I'd hazard a guess that Van Kasper doesn't have an investment banking relationship with either of these companies). On speculation about shorting, one could make the same speculation about the myriad times an analyst puts out or reiterates a buy, preceding such action with going long.
FWIW I primarily frequent the Value Investing thread, and PMFJI from my usual role as a lurker.



To: Jenna who wrote (40534)5/17/1999 9:20:00 PM
From: Kenneth R Miller  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 120523
 
Jenna, I watched AMAT TBFC NTBK all bounce back today after analyst downgrades.. I guess we all have to do our own numbers to know what's going on.. the analyst after all have their own agenda.. generate more traffic and churn and make NITE some more numbers for next quarter.<G>



To: Jenna who wrote (40534)5/17/1999 9:46:00 PM
From: AlienTech  Respond to of 120523
 
>>It might take until 2003, both TBFC and NTBK were downgraded to sell today by some obscure analyst.. FS Van Kasper .. probably not till he shorted them.<<

I am shocked. Jenna, You are getting skeptical. :>