Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Gold who wrote (14043)	5/17/1999 8:29:00 PM
From: Mike Gold	Respond to of 25548

One thing I should have added to the previous post-if you look at the Geology map of Lipangue-you will see 2 small quartz float areas outside the main breccia zone-(between IP line C and D aound station 950 and between line F and G again around station 950.) One of these areas has little mining symbols next to it meaning that it was mined in the past. Even though the surface expression is small-things might be alot more interesting below the surface. Recall that Greg Lillar mentions in his report that the best way to map the breccia zones is by mapping the quartz float...

To: Mike Gold who wrote (14043)	5/17/1999 9:11:00 PM
From: Jim Gold	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Mike, Thanks for your response about the proximity of a theorized porphry to MDHM claims. The real answer is a critical piece of information that could be a fatal assumption on the part of hopeful investors. Right now I'm only assuming that a) The other geologists see the intrusive the same way you do, b) Liller presented that same theory to his sponsors, and c) Liller discussed this in terms of property that MDHM 'owns.' If all my assumptions prove out, then the fact that Liller's sponsors are MDHM investors is good news. Mike, do you think that specific info about the claims would be made available to us low lifes?