Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IATV-ACTV Digital Convergence Software-HyperTV -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Fredericks who wrote (3769)	5/17/1999 11:32:00 PM
From: ed doell	Respond to of 13157

I was looking at the 13D wondering, "what the heck is Bob referring to..." durrrrr Thanks for not flaming, Ed

To: Mike Fredericks who wrote (3769)	5/18/1999 1:28:00 AM
From: miss_dare	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13157

Mike, I am new to the board so bare with me. I am an accountant and would be happy to answer your questions as best I can. You seem to have so many so if you could just type up a list it would help. One thing I know for sure is that I would positively vote NO for the SAR plan. This company already has so many options out there that contribute as an expense to their bottom line and further dilution in their EPS. Increasing the available SARs only adds to this effect because they will only become an additional expense to the company as soon as they are granted. The executives of this company are already being paid quite handsomely. Why give them even more right now? It just doesn't look to me like they deserve it just yet.