Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kapkan4u who wrote (81134)	5/18/1999 2:28:00 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

KalKan - Re : "AMD is capacity constrained. Intel should stop cutting prices and let AMD sell everything they make, while building a huge cash reserve. " Are you afraid of losing MORE MONEY on your AMD investment ? Get used to it. AMD is $30 BELOW its 1984 high - that is 1 -9 -8 -4 which was 15 years ago. Do you know WHY AMD is $30 below their high from 15 years ago? I'll tell you. AMD LOSES MONEY ! That's why. Paul

To: kapkan4u who wrote (81134)	5/18/1999 3:12:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Respond to of 186894

kapkan4 - <AMD is capacity constrained. Intel should stop cutting prices and let AMD sell everything they make, while building a huge cash reserve. It should use the cash to go after Cisco's proprietary IP business in partnership with Microsoft. Wintel made computers a commodity while making billions. They should do the same to networking.> What in the heck does one thing have to do with the other here? I totally fail to see how giving AMD marketshare will propel Intel into a dominant market player in the Network space(?). I agree with the latter, don't see what in the heck it has to do with the former. Two totally different businesses. PB