Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCH Technologies (DCH) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (1565)	5/18/1999 3:18:00 AM
From: Lennart Steiner	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2513

Hi Mr. Goelo, To say it upfront: Generally speaking, because of the type of character I assume you to be behind the posts I am reading from you, I should never waste my time by responding to you as I am doing now. However since it is late at night and I am still watching a real interesting program about B.B.King on channel VH1 anyway, I would like to find out why you are spending so much time to post here when you openly admit in your last post that: I couldn't care less whether the stock goes up or down. Thank you for a short and precise answer with no more BS!!!

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (1565)	5/18/1999 5:14:00 AM
From: Sid Turtlman	Respond to of 2513

Francois: "remember that Oshinsky is an important part of DCHT. He says he is a consultant and an investment banker and Corporate Development... he is a very visible part of DCHT" I disagree. He was fastidious enough for long enough about posting his disclaimer that its recent absence shows that, at the very least, DCHT is no longer paying him a $5000/month fee. It might also mean that he has sold the stock they paid him, or it may not - it is possible that if he states that he intends to hold the stock for "investment purposes" he may not have to post a disclaimer, any more than anyone here who owns the stock is legally required to do so. So your complaints about are about what is now, I believe, an ex-insider of DCHT, in the legal sense, not a current one. He's not doing now the things that he was doing in the past, so I don't see anything to be gained by constantly reiterating them here. Obviously, he still is strongly associated with the company as a close friend, let us call it, and can surely be a strong influence on its behavior, urging management to behave honestly and correctly I would hope. Repetitious bashing will not further that goal.

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (1565)	5/18/1999 10:32:00 AM
From: trader	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2513

repost from FG <<< Trader, it's a bit more than just Oshinsky, you see... I have stated in he past that I couldn't care less whether the stock goes up or down. However, remember that Oshinsky is an important part of DCHT. He says he is a consultant and an investment banker and Corporate Development. I say he is also an aggressive promoter... The point is that he is a very visible part of DCHT and whatever he does has an impact on the Company, whether you like it or not. You can't say: we like DCHT but not Oshinsky, since, as far as the public is concerned, they have seen and read a lot more from him than from DCHT itself. Here again, there is little point burying your head in the sand and wish nothing happened. F. Goelo + + + >>> FG started out to say "its a bit more than oshinsky", however the only subject again posted was FG's beef with H20shinsky. FG continues to show here this is a personal attack at Steve, whom i have not seen advertising anywhere but here. He is so visible????(outside of these threads such as SI or RB), where is he visible. I havent seen him on TV or anything. These threads gather a handful of people maybe 20 30 people monitor the DCHT thread. How can you call that visibility? And tell me when something called aggressive promoting is wrong. Id still like to see DCHT promote its products and gain a stake in the market place before the pie gets cut up to other players.