SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (30230)5/18/1999 9:01:00 AM
From: Labrador  Respond to of 152472
 
I guess the best way for QCOM to fight back against the Journal's myopic analysis of March 1999 royalties is for QCOM to present where the company is going.



To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (30230)5/18/1999 9:06:00 AM
From: Harvey Rosenkrantz  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 152472
 
The blind men at the WSJ touched on one leg of the elephant. These geniuses were so focused on their hitpiece that they ignored the fact that Japan (DDI & IDO) is coming on strong. Perhaps the reason that the Korean Government wanted to lower domestic demand was to increase the availability of product for export. The phones that are exported from Korea are actually better revenue producers for the Q because their royalties are due in $$, not Korean Won.



To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (30230)5/19/1999 9:34:00 AM
From: Jon Koplik  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
O.T. (silly) - re : my son is doing graduate level study in telecommunications and reports that the textbook co-authored by Irwin Jacobs in 1964 (yes, 1964!) is still the number one text in its field. The text contains a detailed exposition of all the theory behind CDMA.

Given the prices (nowadays) for textbooks, it is conceivable that Dr. Jacobs earns more in royalties from his book than he does from running Qualcomm.

Jon.