SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SSP who wrote (18879)5/18/1999 3:14:00 PM
From: Jim Bishop  Respond to of 34075
 
2

Golden Eagle's ability to use its capital stock and other securities to raise working capital and to pay its indebtedness is subject to extensive federal and state regulation. Although Golden Eagle has exerted its best efforts to comply with all applicable regulations, there can be no assurances that it
has been able to do so. To the extent there may be any non-compliance, Golden Eagle may incur certain liabilities, although no such claims have, to Golden Eagle's knowledge, been asserted to date.

To date, Golden Eagle has only been able to achieve limited cash flow from the limited non-commercial mining operations it has conducted. Specifically, to date Golden Eagle has been able to produce and sell approximately 20,000 grams of gold, with post-royalty revenues of $159,000. During the first quarter of
1999, Golden Eagle's operations in Bolivia produced post-royalty revenue of $5,000. All revenues generated to date were used in the Bolivian operations. Although Golden Eagle believes that it will be able to generate a significant amount of additional revenues from mining gold from its properties, no reserves have been established to date, and there can be no assurance that any revenues
received will exceed expenses incurred. In this regard, Golden Eagle has contracted Ronald Atwood, Ph.D., to develop a feasible flow sheet for the metallurgical plant required to recover the fine gold found at Cangalli which has traditionally been lost. Dr. Atwood spent three weeks in the month of April, 1999 in Cangalli carrying out field studies on particle size and distribution,
material handling, and fine gold recoverability testing. Dr. Atwood is also preparing a mine plan for submission to Golden Eagle's Board for consideration and implementation, employing the newly-designed metallurgical plant. Golden
Eagle's ability to pursue any mine plan is dependent on a number of factors, including obtaining necessary government and local consents and permits and, most importantly, obtaining a significant amount of additional financing. There can be no assurance that Golden Eagle will be able to obtain the necessary permits when required, or that it will be able to obtain a sufficient amount of
financing on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.

During the first quarter of 1999, Golden Eagle, through its Bolivian subsidiaries, completed a substantial amount of work on the Cangalli properties.
These activities included ongoing rehabilitation and exploration of the Cangalli shaft, and exploration of several potential open-pit mining sites within the concession area.

Golden Eagle has no significant capital commitments pursuant to its contract with UCL, other than to continue to evaluate and explore its properties in Bolivia with the goal of achieving commercial production if the properties are capable of producing gold commercially. Golden Eagle is contractually
committed to investing $3 million in the development and exploration of the Cangalli property over the 25-year life of the initial contract period. As a result of meetings held with the president and general secretary of the UCL in
Miami, Florida on December 14 and 15, 1998, Golden Eagle's president and corporate secretary committed to fulfill obligations to the cooperative of $42,451 owing on the purchase of equipment from the cooperative and for royalties on production. During the first quarter of 1999, that commitment was
met in full. In addition, Golden Eagle committed to the cooperative that it would finish paying any and all back obligations owed to workers and suppliers in the Cangalli district. Golden Eagle has subsequently met many of those obligations, and has arranged for the payment of certain pending obligations.

Golden Eagle has offered to purchase the interests ("Certificados de Aporte" or "Certificates of Contribution") from each of UCL's 118 members, thereby buying out the Cooperative's interest in the Cangalli properties. Among the conditions precedent that must be met before the offer can be completed is
compliance with U.S. and Bolivian securities laws, as well as acceptance by the UCL members. Golden Eagle's offer to UCL is still pending as of the filing of this quarterly report, and its ability to purchase UCL is contingent upon Golden Eagle's ability to obtain adequate financing, of which there can be no
assurance.

In addition, Golden Eagle believes that a substantial and material risk exists, which Management has termed the "cooperative risk factor." This risk relates to various aspects of Golden Eagle's relationship with the UCL, an organization consisting of 118 members of all socio-economic, education, and political levels and criteria. Golden Eagle's Management has sought and
received, repeatedly, assurances from UCL's president and board of directors that Golden Eagle's subsidiary's contract position and right to the quiet pursuit of its contract rights of exploration, development, and mining will remain undisturbed. Over the course of the contract between Golden Eagle's subsidiary and UCL, approximately 22 years, Golden Eagle has received informal
and formal complaints from UCL's administration regarding Golden Eagle's contract compliance. However, Golden Eagle believes it has always been able to satisfactorily resolve any complaint or dispute. Golden Eagle's management believes that this problem resolution process will continue for the life of the contract, 25 years from January 1996. Factors which are somewhat out of Golden Eagle's management's control regarding the "cooperative risk factor" are:
tortious interference by unrelated third parties, force majeure, commodities and metals market fluctuations, or the failure of governmental institutions to support Golden Eagle's legitimate rights vis-a-vis some illegal action on the part of UCL or third parties. Golden Eagle is aware that certain third parties
are attempting to disrupt Golden Eagle's relationship with UCL. Golden Eagle has defended, and intends to continue to defend, its rights aggressively. Although management believes it will be able to defend its rights, there can be no assurance that it will be successful. During the meetings with members of UCL's
board of directors in December 1998, Golden Eagle's president and corporate secretary received written assurances that relations between UCL and Golden Eagle are extremely cordial and in excellent condition. While Golden Eagle's management's analysis is very positive for future relations, any potential
investors or current shareholders must take notice of the "cooperative risk factor," and weigh it carefully when making any investment decision regarding Golden Eagle's securities.



To: SSP who wrote (18879)5/18/1999 3:17:00 PM
From: Jim Bishop  Respond to of 34075
 
To underscore and promote amicable relations between Golden Eagle and UCL, as indicated above UCL's president, German Nunez, and its General Secretary, Julio Duran, were invited to a confirmation and planning meeting in Miami, Florida, December 15-17, 1998. Rene Velasquez, President of GEBM and EMB, attended, as well as Terry C. Turner, Golden Eagle's President and Board
Chairman, and Mary A. Erickson, Golden Eagle's Corporate Secretary and Board member. Golden Eagle and UCL confirmed the existence of amicable and productive relations between the two organizations. Discussions were held on issues ranging from a buyout of UCL's interests in the Cangalli gold deposit to integration of
UCL's membership into the body of Golden Eagle's shareholders.

As a reciprocal gesture, Golden Eagle's Board of Directors and officers, together with Mr. Velasquez, attended UCL's annual general assembly on February 27, 1999 in Cangalli, Bolivia. Golden Eagle's Board and officers were received very cordially, and the same agenda discussed in Miami, Florida, was discussed at length during a day-long meeting with UCL's entire membership.

Meetings have been scheduled with a committee appointed from UCL's general membership for purposes of negotiating the buyout of UCL's interests in the Cangalli gold deposit. This UCL negotiating committee was authorized and empowered by the full UCL membership during its annual general assembly in
February, 1999, to negotiate a final resolution of all buyout issues. Originally scheduled for mid-April 1999, these meetings have been postponed until May 1999.
While Golden Eagle's management's analysis is very positive for future relations, any potential investors or current shareholders must take notice of the "cooperative risk factor," discussed above and weigh it carefully when making any investment decision regarding Golden Eagle's securities.

However, regarding the purchase of UCL's interest in the Cangalli property, as of the end of the first quarter of 1999, Golden Eagle did not have sufficient liquidity or capital resources to purchase the interests of the UCL members or to accomplish its other operational objectives. Although Golden Eagle's
management is optimistic about its ability to raise the necessary capital, there can be no assurance that Golden Eagle will be able to raise capital when needed, in the amounts needed, or on commercially reasonable terms. Golden Eagle's
current status with a recently-settled SEC investigation (to which its management continues to be subject) and the enhanced regulatory scrutiny resulting therefrom and its poor financial condition, among other conditions, makes it more difficult for Golden Eagle to raise such funds on reasonable
terms. Issues that Golden Eagle believes would be of concern to prospective investors include (without limitation), the significant working capital shortages in the past, the lack of proven mineral reserves or a mine plan, the
difficulties associated with international operations, the concentration of Golden Eagle's assets in a single prospect in Bolivia, and the significant dependence on management.

During the last quarter of 1998 and the first quarter of 1999, Golden Eagle's officers attended several substantive meetings with Bolivian government officials at the highest levels, including: Bolivia's President, Hugo Banzer; the Minister of Economic Development, Jorge Pacheco; the Vice Minister of Mining
and Metallurgy, Rene Rengel; and the Governor of the State of La Paz, Luis Alberto Valle, among others. Golden Eagle's management believes that these meetings foster an important atmosphere of trust and confidence in promoting both Bolivia's national interests, as well as Golden Eagle's corporate
objectives.



To: SSP who wrote (18879)5/18/1999 3:20:00 PM
From: Jim Bishop  Respond to of 34075
 
Because of technical and financial issues on staging its own operations, Golden Eagle's management has decided that one of its important objectives must be carrying out negotiations with potential joint-venture partners for the development of the Cangalli gold deposit. As a condition precedent to beginning
those negotiations, Golden Eagle's management projected that within the fourth quarter of 1998, or within the first quarter of 1999, Golden Eagle would have the initial geological report from its current consulting firm, evaluating its Cangalli gold deposit. Golden Eagle's management believed that it would be important, taking into account all of the existing circumstances, to have this
report in hand as one of its criteria for inviting intended joint venture partners onto the Cangalli properties. The delay in receiving this report has delayed any negotiations with other potential joint venture partners. Golden Eagle cannot assure that any potential joint venture partners will be interested
in evaluating the Cangalli prospects or in negotiating a relationship with Golden Eagle.

Golden Eagle's management isdesirous of firming up other strategic issues before inviting potential joint venture partners onto its Cangalli properties.
Foremost among these other strategic moves, Golden Eagle's management began implementing a program of land acquisition during the fourth quarter of 1998 through the first quarter of 1999, which included, as indicated above, negotiating the ownership of the Cangalli properties currently under Golden
Eagle's contractual control (thereby extinguishing the 18% UCL royalty and eliminating the "cooperative risk" factor, as well as acquiring surrounding properties in the Paleo-Tipuani Trend. Meetings scheduled in mid-April 1999 between an appointed negotiating committee from UCL and Golden Eagle's
management will strive to resolve pending issues for acquiring UCL's interest in the Cangalli properties. Golden Eagle cannot assure that these meetings will produce a positive result for Golden Eagle; however, these negotiations have been advanced in previous meetings with UCL's leadership and general membership.
The completion of any acquisition by Golden Eagle of the surrounding properties or the UCL interests is subject to the availability of adequate financing, of which there can be no assurance.

Golden Eagle also cannot assure that its current surrounding land acquisition program will be successful in acquiring all, or even many, of the significant land holdings in the Paleo-Tipuani Trend. Nevertheless, Golden Eagle's management believes that it is essential, from various strategic
perspectives, to begin these acquisitions and the formal legal proceedings required by Bolivian law to perfect titles on these properties.

On October 7, 1998, Golden Eagle entered into a consulting agreement with Behre Dolbear & Co., Inc. ("BD&C") of Denver, Colorado, an internationally-known consultant to the minerals industry. BD&C agreed to make a site visit to Golden Eagle's Cangalli, Bolivia prospects and attempt to confirm the presence of gold
at a limited number of sites to determine the suitability of areas of the prospect for further exploration and, based on the results of the foregoing efforts, generate a work plan which, if successful, would enable Golden Eagle to identify sufficient resources on the Cangalli property for mining. Golden Eagle
previously reported the results of work by other consultants, but concluded that the techniques used by those other consultants may have been insufficient to justify the calculations made.

BD&C completed its first-phase field evaluation on certain designated target areas within Golden Eagle's Cangalli gold deposit in October 1998. BD&C advised Golden Eagle that its field geologist confirmed the existence of gold mineralization on Golden Eagle's properties. The work BD&C has performed to date confirms Golden Eagle's management's initial conclusion that earlier studies had
focused on too broad an area within the property and that a greater likelihood of success could be realized by Golden Eagle focusing on smaller target areas for more extensive sampling and analysis.

In mid-February, 1999, BD&C carried out a further site review and additional analysis on Golden Eagle's Cangalli properties. As a result of BD&C's investigation, BD&C worked with Golden Eagle's management to identify target areas for more extensive sampling with the intent of identifying sufficient
resources to be considered for future possible mines.

BD&C has emphasized to Golden Eagle that it is not in a position, at this time, to confirm third party estimates or to make its own estimates of existing or potential reserves or resources which the property may contain. BD&C's report on its fieldwork done in October 1998 and February 1999 had just been received
by Golden Eagle as of the date of this Report on Form 10-QSB, and is currently being analyzed by the Company.




To: SSP who wrote (18879)5/18/1999 3:23:00 PM
From: Jim Bishop  Respond to of 34075
 
5

Given Golden Eagle's working capital shortages and current world market conditions for commodities, including minerals and metals, Golden Eagle's management has set the following priorities for the use of proceeds as they become available:

(a) Maintenance of current operations, contractual payments, and land patent payments;

(b) Acquisition of surrounding or adjacent landholdings within the Paleo-Tipuani Trend;

(c) Acquisition of UCL's ownership interests in the Cangalli properties;

(d) Receipt of pending geological and metallurgical reports from consultants who have already performed the necessary fieldwork, or who are currently concluding their field testing;

(e) Implementation of recommendations from the geological and metallurgical reports, including, but not limited to:

i. Constructing a metallurgical recovery plant at Chaco Playa, Chaco Face, begin commercial production;

ii. Entering second-stage resource confirmation work with Golden Eagle's geological consulting firm;

iii. Entering into negotiations, including site visits and initial field studies, with interested joint venture partners.

As stated above, implementation of any or all of these planned strategies by Golden Eagle requires significant infusions of working and operating capital, and Golden Eagle cannot assure that it will be successful in raising that capital through a secondary offering or private placements.

As noted, the future conduct of Golden Eagle's business and its response to issues raised by third parties are dependent upon a number of factors, and there can be no assurance that Golden Eagle will be able to conduct its operations as contemplated. Certain statements contained in this report using the terms "may," "expects to," and other terms denoting future possibilities, are forward-looking
statements. The accuracy of these statements cannot be guaranteed as they are subject to a variety of risks which are beyond Golden Eagle's ability to predict or control and which may cause actual results to differ materially from the projections or estimates contained herein. These risks include, but are not
limited to, the risks described above, and the other risks associated with start-up mineral exploration operations, and Golden Eagle's operations with insufficient liquidity and no historical profitability. It is important that each person reviewing this report understands the significant risks attendant to
Golden Eagle's operations and that of its subsidiaries. As noted, the future conduct of Golden Eagle's business and its subsidiaries is dependent upon a number of factors, and there can be no assurance that any of these companies will be able to conduct its operations as contemplated herein. Golden Eagle disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statement made herein.



To: SSP who wrote (18879)5/18/1999 3:25:00 PM
From: Jim Bishop  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34075
 
6
Results of Operations
---------------------

Golden Eagle's operations in the first quarter of 1999 resulted in significant losses and negative cash flow. Notwithstanding the limited amount of revenues generated from mining operations ($5,000 in post-royalty revenues in the first quarter of 1999), Golden Eagle's general, administrative and other
costs have vastly outstripped the resources generated by Golden Eagle's operations. As described above in "Liquidity and Capital Resources," Golden Eagle has been dependent on loans from affiliated and unaffiliated parties (including certain family members of affiliates), as well as stock issuances
through private placements, to meet its working capital obligations and to finance Golden Eagle's continuing operating losses. There can be no assurance that Golden Eagle will be able to continue to finance its operating losses in such a manner.

The following sets forth certain information regarding Golden Eagle's results of operations during the three months of the first quarter of 1999 compared with the same period in 1998.

Golden Eagle incurred operating expenses totaling $352,811 in the first quarter of 1999, as compared to $456,935 in 1998, a decrease of 23%. As a result of having limited revenues from operations, Golden Eagle incurred operating losses of ($347,734) in 1999 and ($445,135) in 1998, a decrease of 22%.

As of March 31, 1999, Golden Eagle had accrued cumulative compensation and related payroll taxes of approximately $990,700. (Golden Eagle's president, as well as Golden Eagle's secretary/treasurer, were not paid any salary during the
first quarter of 1999; neither Golden Eagle's president nor the secretary/treasurer has been paid any compensation subsequently during 1999, although salaries are continuing to accrue at the rate of $200,000 per year for the president and $150,000 per year for the secretary/treasurer.)

Golden Eagle's costs and operating expenses for first quarter 1999 decreased slightly as to general and administrative expenses, totaling $301,959 compared to $369,927 during the same period in 1998, an 18% decrease. However, first quarter 1999 exploration expenses decreased more substantially from
$55,970 in 1998 to $29,751 in 1999 (see following paragraph).

As of March 31, 1999, capitalized costs related to the Bolivian prospect are principally $100,000 paid for prospect acquisition rights and $797,529 for mining equipment.

Golden Eagle incurred interest expense in the first quarter of 1999 of $76,934, as opposed to first quarter 1998 interest of $122,884. The decrease was a result of less stock issued in 1999 for interest, leading to this 37% decline.
Interest costs will continue, and probably rise significantly, during the balance of 1999 and through the forseeable future because of increased borrowings necessary to maintain liquidity for operating purposes.

Golden Eagle had a net loss for the first quarter of 1999 of ($426,268), or ($.004) per share, compared to its net loss during the same period in 1998 of ($567,959), or ($.006) per share, a decrease of 25% and 33% per share, respectively. Golden Eagle anticipates that the trend of net losses will
continue through the balance of 1999, as it invests further in exploration on its Cangalli prospect and in general and administrative expenses in the United
States and Bolivia, without generating significant revenues from those efforts.
Golden Eagle's continued ability to survive notwithstanding the continuing losses is, as described above, its ability to raise necessary financing. This cannot continue indefinitely and, eventually, Golden Eagle will have to generate
positive cash flows from its operating activities to be able to continue as a
going concern.

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
---------------------------------------

Golden Eagle has not experienced any impact from the effects of inflation during the last three operating periods, 1996, 1997, or 1998, and was not impacted during the first quarter of 1999. Bolivian inflation, while astronomical at points during the early 1980's, has been relatively stable, at less than 10% since 1985, and during the last three years has been less than 8%
per annum.

7

Year 2000 Compliance
--------------------

Although there can be no assurance, Golden Eagle does not anticipate that it will suffer any adverse impact as a result of Year 2000 (Y2K) computer software issues either as a result of third party non-compliance or as a result of internal matters. None of the information technology or other software and
hardware systems utilized by Golden Eagle or its subsidiaries incorporates technology that is incapable of recognizing dates beyond December 31, 1999.

In making the foregoing determination, Golden Eagle assessed embedded systems contained in its office buildings, equipment, and other infrastructures.
As a result, Golden Eagle has not established a contingency plan to come into effect in the event of a Y2K catastrophe, and management does not believe that such a plan is necessary. Of course, Golden Eagle is dependent on facilities outside of its control, such as electrical power supplies, banking facilities, transportation facilities (such as airlines), and communications facilities.
Furthermore, Bolivia, the location of Golden Eagle's mineral property and its significant operations, is an emerging-growth country. Based on Golden Eagle's observation, although Bolivian facilities are attempting to address issues associated with Y2K, it does not appear that the infrastructure (banking
facilities, communications facilities, transportation facilities, and electrical power supplies, among other things) is as sensitive to the issues as in the United States. Also, generally software available in Bolivia is less likely to be Y2K compliant, but Golden Eagle does not believe that a requirement to
replace its existing hardware or software used in its Bolivian operations, if necessary, will materially affect it.

While Golden Eagle believes, based on public reports and some notifications they have received, that the outside facilities in the United States and Bolivia are or will be Y2K compliant, Golden Eagle has no other basis for determining their compliance. The operations of Golden Eagle would be significantly and
adversely affected if any of these outside facilities in the United States or Bolivia are adversely affected by the millennium change or by other issues
related to Y2K.




To: SSP who wrote (18879)5/18/1999 3:34:00 PM
From: Jim Bishop  Respond to of 34075
 
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings
-----------------

On May 7, 1998, the SEC filed a civil action (SEC vs. Golden Eagle International, Inc., et al, No. 98-Z-1020 [D. Colo.]) against Golden Eagle; Golden Eagle's former president (who resigned in May of 1996); Golden Eagle's current secretary/treasurer and a director; Golden Eagle's former public relations firm (which had not performed work for Golden Eagle since before May
1996); and two individuals, regarding acts which had occurred between 1994 and mid-1996. Among the allegations made in the SEC's complaint were that Golden Eagle and the individuals involved had issued press releases which were false and misleading in an attempt to hype the value of Golden Eagle's stock.

On November 14, 1998, the SEC filed an Amended Complaint in the above-referenced action, alleging that Golden Eagle and its president had an inadequate basis for making the May 22, 1998, press release regarding a geological report Golden Eagle had received from an independent geophysicist and
mining engineer regarding the Cangalli gold deposit.

In February 1999, Golden Eagle entered into a Consent and Undertaking, neither admitting nor denying any of the allegations in the SEC's action, but resolving any and all issues as to the SEC's Complaint and Amended Complaint as they relate to Golden Eagle International, Inc., by agreeing to the issuance of
a Permanent Injunction not to violate certain securities laws in the future. Pursuant to that Consent and Undertaking, on March 4, 1999, the Federal District Court for the District of Colorado entered a Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction ordering Golden Eagle not to violate certain securities laws in the
future. Golden Eagle was not assessed any civil or monetary penalty. Although Golden Eagle has resolved the SEC's allegations against it, other defendants remain in the civil action, including two current officers and directors, as well as a former officer and director. Negotiations are currently underway for
the settlement of the allegations against the remaining defendants, but those individuals have denied any wrongdoing that may be actionable under federal securities laws.

8

There are no other material pending or threatened legal proceedings except as disclosed in Golden Eagle's annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1998.

Item 2. Changes in Securities
---------------------

During the quarter ending March 31, 1999, Golden Eagle used its common stock directly to raise capital and to satisfy some of its obligations. Golden Eagle issued a total of 1,285,000 restricted common shares for cash to eight unaffiliated, accredited investors and one unaffiliated unaccredited investor at a price of $.10 per share. These offers and sales were accomplished pursuant to
the exemptions from registration found in Sections 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules thereunder. The funds received from these investors were used to satisfy Golden Eagle's working capital obligations associated with its exploration and evaluation activities in Bolivia, and to
meet Golden Eagle's goals under its agreement with the UCL. There was no underwriter involved in these transactions.

In addition, during the second quarter of 1999 and as of May 7, 1999, three of the investors mentioned in the foregoing paragraph purchased additional restricted common shares for a total of 500,000 shares, and two additional unaffiliated, accredited investors purchased 310,000 restricted common shares.
These shares were issued, and the funds used, under the same terms as described in the foregoing paragraph.

Since late 1994 through the first quarter of 1999, Golden Eagle was publicly-traded under the symbol "MINE" on the OTC Bulletin Board which is operated under the supervision of the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc. ("NASD"). However, in February, 1999, the NASD reassigned the "MINE" symbol to a NASDAQ company, and has assigned to Golden Eagle the trading symbol "MYNG". The OTC Bulletin Board is a securities market utilizing a sophisticated computer and telecommunications network. Market participants
comprise market makers generally dealing in "penny stocks", independent dealers who commit capital and stocks and compete with each other for orders. The OTC Bulletin Board has adopted rules that require companies quoted on its system to be current in their reporting obligations to the SEC, among other things. The
Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted rules, such as Rule 15c2-6, which impose restrictions on a broker-dealer's ability to trade in penny stocks.

On June 22, 1998 the SEC issued a ten-day suspension of trading of Golden Eagle's securities, until July 6, 1998, on the OTC Bulletin Board. At the end of that ten-day suspension, Golden Eagle's securities again began trading on the "pink sheets," a less-sophisticated manual system for posting relevant market
information. The "pink sheet" status of Golden Eagle's securities has created a substantial problem with liquidity for shareholders and potential shareholders interested in trading Golden Eagle's securities. Once Golden Eagle became current on its filings of annual and quarterly reports, its securities were
eligible to return to the OTC Bulletin Board upon the filing by a prospective market maker of a Form 211 pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In February, 1999, one of Golden Eagle's market makers filed the requisite Form 211 with the NASD requesting the return of Golden Eagle's securities to the OTC Bulletin Board. Golden Eagle's market maker, a registered broker-dealer, has
exchanged correspondence with the NASD, and has provided necessary documentation. There can be no assurance, however, that the NASD will find the Form 211, and accompanying documentation, adequate. Until Golden Eagle has received formal notice that its market maker's Form 211 application has been approved, the market for Golden Eagle's common stock will be impaired.