Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : James Cramer -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Adam Weiner who wrote (553)	5/18/1999 10:10:00 PM
From: Stocker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 766

Alright, I've just gone through a dozen postings of BS. Wiener, what you were doing was not about wanting to express an opposing view, it was about publicly defaming Cramer. Let me ask you something - have you and Mark ever considered that the person you insist on slamming every chance you get is a living, breathing human being? This person you insist on attacking is pretty much unknown to you other than the aspects HE chooses to reveal in his columns or on tv. Yet, you claim to have some unique take on him that we all need to be educated about!! I still say it's amazing that a guy like Cramer, with all the flak he takes, even bothers to continue to maintain any sort of public exposure. Why should Cramer or anyone else, character faults or not, have to put with the incessant barrage of crap from people like you with no agenda other than to stir up #$%^. So maybe the guy is wrong once in a while. Fact is, his investing record is far and above the average guy on the street's which has to mean he's been wrong much less often than the average trader. Better still, his desire to talk about how he plays the game and wins is greater than anyone else's. And think about this - if Cramer wasn't writing about his failures as well as his wins, there would be a group of guys like you branding him a bragard. So far, I think, and I'm sure many others here do too, that most of what you have posted here IS "out of context" - OUT OF CONTEXT WITH THIS FORUM, if not at the very least far removed from the truth.