SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (3781)5/19/1999 3:39:00 AM
From: Darren DeNunzio  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12823
 
Cable Modem Specs....

Cable operators have long believed success in the high-speed data business would require that cable modems be interoperable, low-cost and sold at retail like telephone modems and data network interface cards. This way, MSOs could avoid the capital burden associated with purchasing cable modems and leasing them back to subscribers, and consumers would be able to choose products from a variety of manufacturers.

The Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineering's (IEEE) 802.14 Cable TV Media Access Control (MAC) and Physical (PHY) Protocol Working Group was formed in May 1994 by a number of vendors to develop international standards for data communications over cable. The original goal was to submit a cable modem MAC and PHY standard to the IEEE in December 1995, but the delivery date slipped to late 1997.

Tired of waiting for the IEEE 802.14, cable operators combined their purchasing power to jump-start the standards process. In January 1996, cable MSOs Comcast, Cox, TCI, and Time Warner -- operating under a limited partnership dubbed Multimedia Cable Network System Partners Ltd. (MCNS) -- issued a request for proposals (RFP) to retain a project management company to research and publish a set of interface specifications for high-speed cable data services by the end of the year. MSOs MediaOne (formerly Continental Cablevision) and Rogers Cablesystems, and CableLabs, also signed on to the MCNS Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) RFP. Together, this coalition represents the majority of the North American cable industry, serving 85% of U.S. cable subscribers and 70% of Canadian subscribers.

MCNS released its Data Over Cable System Interface Specification (DOCSIS) for cable modem products to vendors in March 1997. To date, more than 20 vendors have announced plans to build products based on the MCNS DOCSIS standard.

A Tale of Two Standards: MCNS vs. IEEE

The differing cable modem specifications advocated by 802.14 and MCNS reflect the priorities of each organization. A vendor-driven group, 802.14 has focused on a creating a future-proof standard based on industrial-strength technology. The MSO members of MCNS, on the other hand, are far more concerned with minimizing product costs and time to market. To achieve its objectives, MCNS sought to minimize technical complexity and develop a technology solution that was adequate for its members' needs.

At the physical layer, which defines modulation formats for digital signals, the IEEE and MCNS specifications are similar. The 802.14 specification supports the International Telecommunications Union's (ITU) J.83 Annex A, B and C standards for 64/256 QAM modulation, providing a maximum 36 Mbps of downstream throughput per 6 MHz television channel. The Annex A implementation of 64/256 QAM is the European DVB/DAVIC standard, Annex B is the North American standard supported by MCNS, while Annex C is the Japanese specification. The proposed 802.14 upstream modulation standard is based on QPSK (quadrature phase shift keying) and 16QAM, virtually the same as MCNS.

For the media access control (MAC), which sets the rules for network access by users, 802.14 has specified Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) as its default solution from the headend to the cable modem. MCNS went a different route, using a scheme based on variable-length packets that favors the delivery of Internet Protocol (IP) traffic. Although the MCNS MAC is based on packets and the IEEE specifies fixed ATM cells, both cable modem solutions specify a 10Base-T Ethernet connection from the cable modem to the PC.

IEEE 802.14 committee members say they chose ATM because it best provides the quality of service (QoS) guarantees required for integrated delivery of video, voice, and data traffic to cable modem units. The group saw ATM as a long-term solution that would provide the flexibility to deliver more than just Internet access.

MCNS members didn't buy the argument. Cable operators are clearly focused on delivering high-speed Internet services to consumers and believed ATM would add unnecessary complexity and cost to cable modem systems. By supporting a variable-length packet implementation, MCNS members plan to capitalize on the favorable pricing associated with Ethernet and IP networking technology.



To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (3781)5/19/1999 3:49:00 AM
From: Darren DeNunzio  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 12823
 
Wireless Cable...

Wireless cable, also called fixed wireless broadband, is emerging as a legitimate local access platform for the delivery of high-quality digital data, video and voice services. Like their cable competitors, wireless operators are increasingly using their spectrum to offer high-speed Internet services.

Just like wired cable, a 6 MHz wireless television channel can support 27 Mbps of downstream data throughput using cable modems with 64 QAM (quadrature amplitude modulation) technology. Historically, a telephone-return path has been used for upstream communication, but operators are now transitioning to full
two-way wireless delivery.

Wireless cable technology has limitations, but it also has key benefits, most notably, the ability to rapidly introduce high-speed data access throughout a metropolitan area without the cost or delay of wired plant upgrades. Rather than stringing thousands of miles of fiber, coax or twisted-pair wiring, a wireless operator installs a headend and transmission tower and is open for business. The technology received a major endorsement in April 1999 when telecom giants Sprint and MCI WorldCom purchased three wireless operators for more than $1 billion to build a broadband wireless local loop.

Wireless Cable Primer

There are several wireless spectrum blocks in the 2.1 to 2.7 GHz band that can be used for cable television and Internet services, including multipoint distribution service (MDS), multichannel multipoint distribution service (MMDS) and instructional television fixed service (ITFS). Additionally, wireless communications service (WCS) spectrum allocated in 5 MHz and 10 MHz increments and can be used for digital data or video. UHF (ultra-high frequency) broadcast television spectrum can also potentially be used for high-speed data access with cable modem technology, as can local multipoint distribution service (LMDS) spectrum, located in the super-high 27.5 - 29.5 GHz frequency range.

Wireless Cable Spectrum in the 2.1 - 2.7 GHz Band

Frequency Range Service Type Number of Channels Channel Width
2.150 - 2.162 GHz MDS 2 6 MHz
2.305 - 2.320 GHz WCS 2 5 & 10 MHz
2.345 - 2.360 GHz WCS 2 5 & 10 MHz
2.500 - 2.596 GHz ITFS 16 6 MHz
2.596 - 2.644 GHz MMDS 8 6 MHz
2.644 - 2.686 GHz ITFS 4 6 MHz
2.686 - 2.689 GHz MMDS 31 125 KHz

In the U.S., traditional wireless cable system operators have aggregated available MDS, MMDS and ITFS spectrum in a given market, providing up to 200 MHz of bandwidth, the equivalent of 33 analog 6 MHz television channels.

Like broadcast television, MDS/MMDS/ITFS transmission is based on line-of-sight technology. Wireless cable signals are transmitted from a broadcast tower, usually located on a mountain or tall building, to special antennas affixed to residences or businesses throughout a local market.

Reliable wireless service delivery requires a direct line of sight between the transmitter and the receiving antenna. As is the case with broadcast TV, obstructions like dense tree cover, hills, tall buildings, or even heavy precipitation can hinder reception. Multipath distortion (which results from signal reflections off of buildings or other structures) can also cause problems. Distance is a consideration too, as wireless cable signals can typically only be received within a 30-mile radius of the transmitter. Wireless cable
operators believe these impediments can be overcome by dispersing a number of transmitters throughout a market in a cellular architecture.

Wireless Cable Modem Access Networks

Similar to delivering wired cable data services, a cable modem router and related networking gear is installed in the wireless operator's headend. Digital data signals, such as Internet content requests, are then modulated onto radio frequency (RF) channels for broadcast transmission to roof-top antennas at subscriber locations. Coaxial cable is run from the antenna to a downconverter (which shifts the microwave signal frequency into the cable television band) and then into the cable modem inside the customer premise. The cable modem demodulates the incoming high-speed data signal and passes it on to an individual PC or local area network (LAN) though a 10Base-T Ethernet link. Wireless operators offering Internet access have typically used a telephone-return path for upstream communication, but they are migrating to full two-way wireless data delivery.

Cable modem manufacturer Hybrid Networks estimates that one 6 MHz wireless cable channel (MDS, MMDS, ITFS or UHF) can support 650 to 1,500 simultaneous active high-seed data users, providing peak downstream burst rates up to 1.5 Mbps or more to individual users. Assuming that only 20 percent of users are online at a given time, a single channel can support 5,000 subscribers, whether they are home-based consumers or individuals connected to a business LAN.

Wireless Cable Modem Service Availability

A number of MDS/MMDS/ITFS operators have commercially deployed high-speed data services to date, mostly using wireless cable modem technology from Hybrid Networks.

American Telecasting Inc. (ATI) has launched service in Denver and Colorado Springs, Colo., plus Portland, Ore. CAI Wireless Inc. has launched in Rochester, N.Y. and in New York, N.Y. CS Wireless Inc. has deployed high-speed Internet service in Dallas, Texas. People's Choice TV (PCTV) has launched its SpeedChoice service in Phoenix, Ariz. and Detroit, Mich., while DirectNET is offering service commercially in Ft. Lauderdale, Fla .

These wireless operators are typically pricing unlimited high-speed Internet access at $40 to $80 per month for consumers and $70 to $100 for small office/home office (SOHO) businesses. For larger businesses, some wireless operators are charging $150 to $200 to connect one user on a business LAN (local area network), plus $50 to $75 for each additional LAN user.

Two-Way Wireless Cable Modem Services

In the past, a key issue facing wireless cable modem technology was the lack of two-way capabilities. Reliance on a telephone return path limits upstream transmission speeds for end-users. Furthermore, it adds costs to the wireless service provider for incoming telephone lines and dial-up modem pools.

In the U.S., the FCC is approving the use of MDS, MMDS and ITFS spectrum for upstream and downstream broadcasts. A number of operators are trialing two-way services and PCTV is now offering two-way wireless cable modem service commercially in Phoenix.

Upgrading wireless cable systems to support two-way transmission is technically challenging, as it requires operators to convert broadcast television systems into networks that more closely resemble a cellular telecommunications platform. Additionally, a "transverter" must be added at the customer premise to transmit data upstream.