SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : LifeOne, Inc. (LONE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GlenRP who wrote (626)5/19/1999 8:46:00 AM
From: paper man  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1834
 
GlenRp. your post is smart and on the money. Steet name holdings are there for exposure and manipulation.
1. some MMs and brokers dpnt even fulfill street name accounts until the client sells, and this is when those shares are actually fulfilled.
2. street name accounts are there for TK to short if he would like, other than TK executing a naked short( never even consumes a street account, just sells shares that are invisible)
3. anytime you buy a penny stock, you should have certs issued on a majority. this authenticates your buy and forces MM and broker to fulfill the position, noit with ghost trades.
4. having certs issued is not a problem you can sell em any time. people who buy in margin accounts or IRAs ofcourse will not do this. But, cash accounts in street name are nothinf more than an open wallet for the MMand Broker to manipulate.

There is only ONE value to not pulliung certs. if the Mm or broker doesnot properly fulfill the buys in your account, if the stock escalates in value they will be forced to eventually fulfill the account at higher prices( there own risk) and this is called a short sqeeze on price!!

good luck to all



To: GlenRP who wrote (626)5/19/1999 3:11:00 PM
From: Puck  Respond to of 1834
 
I'll support whatever you want to do so long as it has Brent's blessing. Additionally, from reading many other threads on SI, I have come to believe that anyone can short a BB stock. The difficulty can be in finding shares to short. I have paid particular attention to the HITT thread. Some professional shorts dug up a lot of very ugly dirt on that company early last week and shorted it massively with impunity--there's so much crap about it that I don't think the stock will ever recover because nobody will be able to believe in it again. Very quickly others joined the thread. One poster complained about not being able to find shares initially but after a couple days he did; although he had to shop around and open an account at a brokerage that could fulfill his wish. Incidently one of the pros asked another pro if he knew of any broker that had shares available for shorting. The other replied "Smith". I presume that meant Salomon Smith Barney and that he was trying to be discreet about it by abbreviating the name. Here's a list of names of SI members who are obviously quite accomplished and spend a lot of time looking for scams (usually BB stocks) to short. I presume they all hold long positions as well but for the short term. Some of them are hedge fund managers and have hundreds of millions at their disposal. Each one has his own thread and a devoted following. The exchange of ideas is good and for the most part the pros appear willing to share their knowledge with others who are sincerely interested and respectful. They benefit mightily by communicating with others, who respect their judgment, about what they are doing because these people might follow their lead. The larger the following, the more they can fulfill their own prophecies about a stock's price movement. Check them out:

Bear Down (seems nice),
Auric Goldfinger,
Anthony@Pacific (seems very nice; also has his own website and conducts weekend seminars for people who are willing to spend a lot to learn his strategies),
and Mr. Pink

Janice Shell and mshater are very sharp too but I don't think they have their own threads.

(Regarding Mr. Pink, you have to play his game or he may be unresponsive. Pretend that He is a God, deify him in your posts, and he'll be likely to answer you and provide valuable insight. I think he could be a very great resource because he obviously has many connections and a great deal of experience. He's very smart but can be very caustic if he feels you have insulted him. Recently he attacked a women named Kimberly Lee for no good reason I could find. {I think she is someone (she goes both short and long) with no formal background in the securities industry who has learned a great deal about anticipating short term market movements on her own and now has her own thread. She has an unusually large following, and her posts are very friendly. She has a good relationship with Anthony@Pacific and Bear Down, judging by her posts. On one of her messages, she claimed that she talks to mutual fund and hedge fund managers and also market makers on the phone regularly. Incidently Bear Down uncovered the dirt behind the stock featured on SI's front page last month underneath the heading The Scum Also Rises.)} Mr. P became aware of Kimberly's existence somehow this past weekend, decided he didn't like her because of the stocks she's been involved with and her trading strategies, and told her so. Her followers then swamped his board with inane posts and drove him temporarily to another thread. It was all very amusing to see from my perspective; although all or most of them have probably violated SI's policies about member conduct and could conceivably be disciplined if they were reported. I don't think anything will happen and it doesn't bother me. Mr. P. has pissed off a lot of other people and many would like to know who he is. He is also being sued, along with others, by companies that feel he has slandered them. (To see how venemous he is when he publicly attacks a corporation, check out the thread ACRT Going To Zero.) The Wall St. Jou. speculated about a year ago that he is a Mr. Loeb (if I'm not mistaken, who manages a hedge fund in NY). He maintains his secrecy assiduously. Yet some must know. Someone very recently asked him (on his thread) if her were engaged to so and so and he responed that their engagement had been broken--truth or lie? It seems possible to me that someone could figure out the person behind the alias if they really wanted to.