SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tomas who wrote (44985)5/19/1999 9:33:00 AM
From: Les H  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
European Investment in Iraq Oil Fields

dailynews.yahoo.com



To: Tomas who wrote (44985)5/19/1999 10:29:00 AM
From: Aggie  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 95453
 
Tomas, hello again,

Well... Mr. Chambers cetainly tip-toed around that one, didn't he? The North Sea, like the GOM, is a mature province which by definition means the prospects are becoming smaller. Unlike the GOM, there do not appear to be the sort of deep water depositional environments that have been attracting so much attention and sustaining the GOM exploration infrastructure.

Finding/lifting costs, I would imagine, would be similar for N. Sea prospects when put alongside the tremendous cost of some of these GOM plays - that is, if you were to strip out the cost associated with the enormous regulatory burden that comes with operating in the N. Sea. Keep in mind that the North Sea was never just an oil and gas development - it was also about jobs. The cost implication of all this regulation is poorly tracked but cannot be ignored.

While I work in mostly 3rd world countries, my company is active in the North Sea. Typically, one of my wells will have a core staff of 3 - 4 people, with other 'time-writers' (people who devote a portion of their work day) numbering around 5 - 8, maybe. In the North Sea arena, that number is easily doubled, usually trebled.

Good Luck to All
Aggie