SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robert who wrote (30367)5/19/1999 4:44:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 152472
 
Robert, I read that earlier, made allot of sense. <eom>



To: Robert who wrote (30367)5/19/1999 4:52:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 152472
 
Anyone notice the 2 huge blocks traded 110, & 100 K shares @ the close?



To: Robert who wrote (30367)5/19/1999 6:07:00 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Robert, I couldn't agree more, but I have one question for you or anyone else. With the large number of shares outstanding and the rather large market capitalization, is it possible for even large traders to have much impact on the price? Isn't QCOM getting to the point where such attempts at manipulation are well nigh fruitless? For any protracted selling to occur, it seems to me that you would have to see a major article in a publication like The Wall Street Journal (!).



To: Robert who wrote (30367)5/19/1999 10:27:00 PM
From: JGoren  Respond to of 152472
 
It is interesting how the price of the stock moves down when triple witching day is upon us. Might make some sense on why the WSJ wrote what it did and the short rumors Gregg had heard for several days before that. Dumb clutzes such as the writer get used (or worse) and the rumors are passed on to get an article that will trend the stock down. Let's just hold on through Friday, and watch the recovery take place.