SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jeffbas who wrote (7225)5/20/1999 2:45:00 PM
From: Bob Davis  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78567
 
Jeffrey,

CLZR is still clearly a value stock. I've published an in-depth fundamental Analysis of the Company at napeague.com, and it has also been recently cited as undervalued by Jim Oberweis.

I would like to note that I originally published a positive Analysis on CLZR back in late June 1998, when it was below $3.00. If I remember correctly, and your name is quite easy to remember <BG>, you flamed me rather thoroughly when I posted about CLZR at that time.

Bob Davis
The Napeague Letter
napeague.com



To: jeffbas who wrote (7225)5/20/1999 2:59:00 PM
From: moat  Respond to of 78567
 
When was 15 p/e for a 100% per year grower not value? I have provided the logic (through hard research), where is yours? (They are doing a secondary because the business is strong and they need the cash to grow the business)

And about the stock being up. KO was up over 5000 times before Buffett bought it. CLZR is no KO, but its products are selling very very well.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News