Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Creative Computers(MALL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rajiv who wrote (1434)	5/20/1999 9:16:00 AM
From: RockyBalboa	Respond to of 1634

Rajiv, bright thought! The distribution of stock to Old MALL holders within MALL can significantly increase the float (or better freely tradeable shares). But I try to differentiate MALL "control" vs. Ubid "control". Consider an officer working with Ubid ("The company"), not Mall. This one will be subject to the 144 ruling as stock of his own company is being distributed to him. Now consider an officer who works with MALL but not UBID which is another, unaffiliated company per the separation agreement. That one is no Ubid insider, and reg. rules only should apply to those MALL (then Ubid) owners who have significant stakes (as stated).