SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : What do you think about ESRX? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David L. Wasylenko who wrote (31)5/20/1999 8:24:00 AM
From: lin huan chen  Respond to of 39
 
David:
Sorry, I have not followed ESRX that closely. I just have a vague memory about when it was announced and it finished its acquisition last month.

regards
Lin



To: David L. Wasylenko who wrote (31)5/20/1999 8:28:00 AM
From: lin huan chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39
 


Article 1 of 130
WEEKDAY TRADER:Can Express Scripts Write Its Own Ticket?

05/20/1999
Dow Jones News Service
(Copyright (c) 1999, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)



By Lawrence Strauss

This story was first published Wednesday

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Express Scripts Inc. (ESRX), a leading pharmacy benefit management company, attached a .com to its name in late March when it announced it had formed a subsidiary to sell drugs online.

The stock promptly soared to 105 1/2 on March 30, up more than 30 points on the day, before closing just south of 92.

But Express Scripts' stock came back down to earth. And quickly. It closed Wednesday at 69, up 3 13/16 on the day but still off about 35% from its peak less than two months ago.

Why the plunge? After the initial euphoria, the company's Internet strategy failed to catch fire. Similarly, retail drugstore stocks such as CVS Corp. (CVS) have sold off amid anxiety about online competition. (See Weekday Trader, "Can CVS Spell Relief to Shareholders?," May 12. CVS announced Monday that it agreed to buy startup Internet drug retailer Soma.com in a move aimed at coopting online competition.)

Moreover, an impending secondary offering, in which Express Scripts will sell 4.5 million shares to the public, has raised concerns about there being too much stock on the market. The company says it plans to use some of the offering's proceeds to pay down debt. Express Scripts, in which insurance company New York Life holds about a 45% stake, has a market value of about $2.4 billion.

But even the bulls are at a loss to explain exactly why the share price has fallen below where it traded before the fateful Internet announcement in late March. That's because they regard Express Scripts as a fundamentally sound company whose solid financial pedigree includes long-term earnings growth at least in the high-20% range.

"The core business is great; the Internet [business] would be cream," declares Karey Barker, a portfolio manager of Wasatch Mid-Cap Fund, whose holdings include Express Scripts.

What's more, the bulls insist that Express Scripts, with its strong ties to health benefits payers, is in a much better position to capitalize on e-commerce than is a drugstore.com, which thus far has had little success cracking crucial third-party-payment contracts.

Express Scripts, which handles the prescription-drug piece of health benefit packages, has more than 46 million customers and a strong mail-order business, a base that offers lots of potential leverage online, the bulls contend.

And Express Scripts really is planning to step up its Internet presence this summer when it rolls out YourPharmacy.com, which will offer prescription drugs and over-the-counter items like vitamins online. Express Scripts does not sell those items now, relying solely on reimbursements from third-party payers.

Fans of the company also point out that Express Scripts, the number-three player in the industry behind Merck-Medco and PCS, is well-positioned to take advantage of the growing elderly population and its use of prescription drugs. "There aren't super-high margins [in the industry]," says Barker. "But they are in a good position, and people like the fact that they're independent." That independence from big drug companies also gives Express Scripts lots of buying clout with different suppliers.

Merck & Co. (MRK), the U.S. pharmaceutical giant, owns Merck-Medco, while drugstore retailer Rite Aid Corp. (RAD) owns PCS. But thanks to the acquisition in the last 13 months of two players in the pharmacy benefit management field - ValueRx a year ago and Diversified Pharmaceutical Services in April - Express Scripts has solidified its position against the competition. The stock offering should help Express Scripts make more strategic acquisitions, online or otherwise, by helping it pay down debt.

And the proof is in the numbers. Barbara Ryan of BT Alex. Brown and the handful of securities analysts who track the stock were encouraged by the company's strong first-quarter results.

"We expect continued momentum to drive operating performance in 1999 and beyond," notes Ryan, whose firm rates the stock Strong Buy with a 12-month price target of 95 to 99. (BT Alex. Brown is an underwriter of the secondary offering.)

In the first quarter, net income rose 38% from a year earlier, to 40 cents per share, a penny better than analysts' consensus estimate, according to First Call. Helped by the purchase of ValueRx, revenues came in at just under $900 million, up 142% from a year earlier.

Meanwhile, Barker, the Wasatch fund manager, calls Express Scripts' valuation "reasonable." She says her fund "trimmed a little on [the] Internet run," which she called "a little crazy." And at current prices? "We think it's an interesting opportunity," she says.

As of Wednesday's close, the shares changed hands at about 30.7x the consensus 2000 earnings per share estimate of $2.25, according to First Call. That's not exactly a bargain-basement multiple, but it is a discount to Express Scripts' projected 2000 earnings growth rate of 32% (though it's a slight premium to its long-term compound annual growth rate of 27%). Historically, the stock has traded "from right below its growth rate to 35% to 50% ahead of it," says Ryan.

Also, with New York Life holding such a large stake, Express Scripts hasn't traded "like most $2.4-billion [market cap] companies," says Morgan Keegan & Co. analyst Gary Stevenson. Morgan Keegan is also underwriting the secondary offering, which Stevenson hopes will improve the stock's liquidity.

Liquidity isn't the only concern. Contracts with payers typically don't last more than three years, leaving Express Scripts vulnerable to defections or consolidation within the HMO industry. There's also strong competition from other physician benefit management companies, which could poach some key drugstore-chain customers.

But the bulls are confident that Express Scripts is poised to write a much more compelling story-online, on Wall Street and in the real world.

(END) DOW JONES NEWS 05-20-99

08:00 AM



To: David L. Wasylenko who wrote (31)5/20/1999 8:37:00 AM
From: lin huan chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39
 
SmithKline details sweeping changes: Sells two U.S. businesses: To cut workforce by more than a quarter over four years

02/10/1999
National Post
National
Page C11
(c) Copyright 1999 Financial Post from National Post (formerly The Financial Post Company). All rights reserved.


Anglo-U.S. drug group SmithKline Beecham PLC outlined plans yesterday to focus on prescription pharmaceuticals and consumer health care, with a surprise shakeup of its manufacturing units and the sale of two underperforming U.S. health-care businesses for $2- billion (US).

The group said the changes would cut its workforce by more than a quarter over the next four years and predicted earnings per share growth would grow sharply as it concentrates on high margin businesses, rising 15% or more in 2000 and 2001.

SmithKline also published 1998 results, which showed pre-tax profit up 6% before exceptional items at (ps)1.71-billion ($4.16-billion Cdn) on sales up 4% at (ps)8.08-billion. The figures were at the bottom end of expectations.

Jan Leschley, chief executive, denied its actions were a way of clearing the decks for SmithKline to take part in the tide of consolidation engulfing Europe's drug industry.

"This has nothing to do with the previous discussions we have had on mergers [with Glaxo Wellcome PLC and American Home Products]. We think we'll be an independent company now, a stronger company, and I think the accelerated growth forecasts we have made for 2000-2001 reflect that," he said.

"We are not talking to anybody and we don't plan to talk to anybody," he said, after two sets of merger talks broke down last year.

Despite the denials, SmithKline shares, which have been supported in recent days by a renewal of merger speculation, were up 4.1%, or 33 pence, at 831.5p.

SmithKline ended days of speculation that it was preparing to sell Clinical Laboratories, which carries out more than 110 million swab and tissue tests a year, and Diversified Pharmaceutical Services, which manages drug benefit plans for more than 20 million U.S. employees.

Clinical Laboratories, which has been involved in litigation over alleged charging irregularities, was sold to Quest Diagnostics Inc. for just more than $1-billion (US) in cash, plus a 29.5% stake in Quest worth about $245-million (US).

DPS was sold to rival Express Scripts Inc. for $700-million (US), a fraction of the $2.3-billion (US) Mr. Leschley paid for it in 1994 amid a rush for drug benefit managers that never paid off. The group said it had a one-off net loss of (ps)446-million on the sale.

The proceeds will be used to shrink SmithKline's debt to 15% of equity from 52% at the end of 1998. The restructuring, which will cost (ps)750-million over four years, is aimed at generating cost savings of (ps)200-million a year to be invested in developing and marketing new drugs.

"This means we are clearly focusing on pharmaceuticals and consumers," said Mr. Leschley.

The changes involve a cut in the group's workforce by more than 15,000 by 2002, taking it to less than 43,000. Some 3,000 jobs are to go as part of shakeup of manufacturing and product sourcing, including closure and sale of existing plants, with the rest accounted for by DPS and Clinical Laboratories.


I was announced 2/10 and closed at 4/1.
regards