Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TheBigHub.com (OTC:BHUB) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: skyridge who wrote (588)	5/20/1999 10:21:00 AM
From: Boquacious	Respond to of 666

skyridge, please change your name to skydreams. Regards, Bodqua

To: skyridge who wrote (588)	5/20/1999 10:33:00 AM
From: opalapril	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 666

I have to disagree with you. The SLEU site looks okay but not much better (and in some cases a little worse) than any local ISP could create. The backbone doesn't belong to SLEU/BHUB. I ran some search experiments on it. What it revealed to me is there is very little original content on SLEU and its own indexing is quite poor or uninclusive. For the most part, as a portal site SLEU relies on better known search engines like Inktomi etc. Nothing is new, very little is original, the design is mostly clean -- but so what? There are tens of thousands of clean designs on the web. That doesn't make them profitable or even survivors. More to the point, now, is Auric's argument. The company has never chosen to release its financials, never mind they aren't "required' to. New management seems to be known principally for past stock manipulation. It issued a grotesque 5-for-1 convertible at an offering price that implies a value of the common stock of less than $1. Waldron Securities, just found guilty by a federal court of stock manipulation, is a dealer in BHUB shares. Would you hand over thou$and$ of dollars to a stranger off the street knowing no more than this about him? Then why do it through a broker?

To: skyridge who wrote (588)	5/20/1999 10:37:00 AM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 666

You're like the Monty Python Knight who has been delimbed and insists on fighting. You are WAY Wrong about shorting being a short term game. I have ton's-o-POSistions that I've been short for years, and will pay not taxes unitl they are not quoted. Now if you wanna talk about lightweight shorts that are the mirror image of you, well then yeah sure. But not the hardcore shorts. I am here for GTO's and this is one of 'em.