SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (48736)5/20/1999 3:53:00 PM
From: lorrie coey  Respond to of 67261
 
One man's "satisfaction" is another man's nemesis...



To: one_less who wrote (48736)5/20/1999 4:08:00 PM
From: lorrie coey  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Matthew 5:5.4

"Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth."

[2Esdr 11:42.6]

..."for you have afflicted the meek and injured the peaceable; you have hated those who tell the truth, and have loved liars; you have destroyed the dwellings of those who brought forth fruit, and have laid low the walls of those who did you no harm."



To: one_less who wrote (48736)5/20/1999 10:15:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
>And yet that was not your will in this scenario.<

And so in this scenario I did not have Might.

>Your will was to realize a satisfying relationship. Your strategy to achieving this goal was to overcome the female with your might. You ultimately failed to achieve your goal even though you overcame the female.<

And as far as my will to overcome the female goes, I had Might and there exists no one to claim me wrong. As far as my overcoming Nature to achieve “satisfaction” I had not Might in this instance, and therefore I have no authority to claim I have been misused. In any event Might makes Right, whether I have Might or someone or something else has it.

>Checkmate, you were a wrong-headed dolt to have used your might in this way.<

Certainly, but this represents no checkmate. Indeed you have checkmated yourself. The circumstances themselves disallowed my satisfaction, and so they were Mightier than I, leaving me with no authority to claim them wrong. But even this is not always the case. I may have had a will to rape the female for other purposes, and I may have actually achieved those purposes. By what Authority can anyone claim me wrong? By none. Checkmate.

>Your will to have satisfaction was not only defeated it was defeated ultimately and eternally.<

Well now this is certainly not exactly true. Satisfaction is really quite subjected to my own way of thinking. I may, after pondering the circumstances truly conclude that the rape really was a blast and that I should do it again just for kicks. By what Authority can I be judged wrong? By none.