SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jeffbas who wrote (7238)5/20/1999 3:38:00 PM
From: cfimx  Respond to of 78565
 
>>Then tell me the last time you know of that a company did a secondary
at the kinds of prices we talk about that make value stocks. <<

pme, a week or two ago - of course you'll have to do a little digging to figure out WHY it is a value. you WON"T get it from yhoo.

oh, and ecp a month before that...



To: jeffbas who wrote (7238)5/20/1999 3:57:00 PM
From: moat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78565
 
Jeffrey Bash, I know what your problem is:

1) You don't understand that value investing and growth investing are two sides of the same coin. Both Buffett and Munger have said this a hundred times. Intrinsic value = future cash flow discounted to present. Use this equation to calculate if you are buying a stock at a discount to that calculation. ("value" does not *only* mean p/b, etc)

2) You only have one model in your mind. Read: "To a man with a hammer, every problem is a nail." Buffett "moved on" from Graham's model, and said "It should be noted that your Chairman, always a quick study, required only 20 years to recognize how important it was to buy good businesses. In the interim, I searched for 'bargains' – and had the misfortune to find some."

3) You don't bother to do the research -- you did not read about company fundamentals before commenting on the stock.

Finally, all I am saying is that a stock is very cheap at 15 p/e when its growth rate is at 100% Y/Y.