SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tony Viola who wrote (81277)5/20/1999 8:12:00 PM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tony - Thanks for the SHM summary. PB2.



To: Tony Viola who wrote (81277)5/20/1999 11:04:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tony - Re: "Paul, I tried to ferret the SA-1110 SOAC out of my notes to ask you about it at the lunch, but couldn't find it then. What is it? Timna???"

No.

The SA1110 is a 1 1/2 generation StrongARM CPU that I believe was already in design when Intel acquired DEC.

It has some updated features from the original StrongARM SA1100 and should run at 133 to 206 MHz - on the old DEC process. The part should sample by next month.

Note - this differs from the true Second Generation StrongARM CPUs that are just being designed now and will be manufactured next year on Intel's 0.18 micron process.

Timna is an integrated x86 CPU - supposedly a one-chip version with CPU, Chip sets & graphics on one piece of silicon. Design of this chip is being done in Israel.

Paul



To: Tony Viola who wrote (81277)5/21/1999 12:13:00 PM
From: Harry Landsiedel  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tony Viola. Re: Ann. Meeting. Thanx for posting your notes. Also thanx for posting the NYTimes article. All most informative.

Here is a recent write-up on Intc from Bear Stearns, focusing on the implications of intc's hi-end chips.

Things Are Looking Up; Maintain Buy
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*** Key Points: While the formation of the Intel 64 Fund, a
venture capital fund to invest in technology companies focused on
software development for the IA-64 (Intel Architecture 64), has
little short-term impact, it highlights an important shift that
we believe will take place in investor perception towards the
significant and positive implications of the entry into the high-
end, i.e., 64-bit, market. Specifically, a great deal of
attention is focused on the implications of Intel's low-end. To
us, the larger story over the next few years is the implications
of Intel's introduction of a 64-bit product family, starting with
"Merced" (the code name) in mid-2000 and "McKinley" in 2001
(followed by "Madison" and "Deerfield.")
Intel said it formed a
$250 million fund with leading technology companies (Compaq,
Dell, Hewlett-Packard, NEC and SGI) and venture capitalists with
a focus on "technology first, return on investment second." The
lead investors were focused on companies that were not in the
operating system business (i.e., Microsoft, IBM) to maintain
objectivity.
*** Quantifying The High End. While this approach is a rough
estimate, we believe we have the right order of magnitude: we
believe that the incremental impact of Intel's entry into the 64-
bit market could be significantly incremental and profitable.

Today, Intel has a microprocessor business which was around $21-
$22 billion in 1998 with average selling prices of around $220-
$230. The high-end of the computer market, which Intel will
target with IA-64, could be as large as its existing market with
selling prices in the $800-$3,000 range. Our projection is based
on the size of the high end, which could be a $120 billion
equipment market of which we would estimate that the
microprocessor content could be in the $20-$30 billion range

(which is a speculative numbers since most high-end vendors such
as IBM or H-P do not sell their chips on the merchant market).
*** No Change In Outlook. As to the outlook, no change in our
estimates of $2.25 for 1999 and $2.55 for 2000. The stock
remains a Buy.

BEAR, STEARNS & CO. INC.
EQUITY RESEARCH

HL



To: Tony Viola who wrote (81277)5/22/1999 7:36:00 PM
From: Pigboy  Respond to of 186894
 
Tony,

Thanks for the exceptional summary. I appreciate it. I do wonder how server farms and Fibre Channel will be related, if at all. My impression is that SANs might actually lessen the need for more servers. So, you could say I'm a little confused when EMC is heading both way into Fibre Channel SANs and either separately or in conjunction with using server farms.

pigboy