SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Citrix Systems (CTXS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MikeM54321 who wrote (6574)5/21/1999 10:16:00 AM
From: P2V  Respond to of 9068
 
Thanks Mike, I think I follow you. Very interesting way
to utilize someone elses CPU Power, with your own thin client.

BTW CTXS's 100 day chart shows a great recovery.

Best,
Mardy.



To: MikeM54321 who wrote (6574)5/21/1999 12:09:00 PM
From: dreydoc  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9068
 
Mike:

[re: use of demo on Novell server to get high speed access]

Interesting idea but it doesn't appear to work as you speculate. I tested simultaneous access to a number of sites,(including Fidelity just to be sure ;-) over a dial-up 28.8 connection and results were variable. Sometimes ICA was faster, sometimes not.

It appears that ICA draws .gif files one screen-line at a time, so Peter still crawls down the screen. I used a resident copy of Explorer 5.0 that I found elsewhere on their server against a local copy of Explorer 4.0 on my PC. Clearly not a scientific test, as the two copies of Explorer 4.0 needed to run both windows on one PC are sharing local resources. It did appear to reach www.cisco.com about 30% faster but I'd demur on any conclusions drawn. There are too many unknowns in my faux test, i.e. what's the back-end Internet port, local resource contention, number of routers/hops to the net and site, etc.

Interesting thought though. Might be worthy of a controlled environment test.

Thanks.

dd

Oh, and just for fun - I reset the local server-based Explorer to default to www.citrix.com ;-)