SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (60303)5/21/1999 7:20:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Brian, Just how fast does the mail arrive at your house? Within ours of requesting info from a co.? Amazing! Stop being a total jackass and take a Prozac.



To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (60303)5/21/1999 7:36:00 PM
From: JF Quinnelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
I have given you time and yet no mention of AMAT's investment in the ghost-fab. Now I will call you a liar... The simple answer is that this type of inaccurate(Read: lying) posting

Maybe you ought to consider the difference between lies and disputed evidence. MB may very well be mistaken. But if MB produces data showing that AMAT has recorded orders to a subsidiary, would that make you a liar? Or simply wrong? You can make your case without resorting to accusations.



To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (60303)5/22/1999 10:20:00 AM
From: Mike M2  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
Brian, I cannot give you any details whatsoever but I do recall reading about a possible AMAT investment in a fab. Mike is never wrong (almost)-g-. Earlie is back perhaps he can settle this matter. You have slimed our hallowed leader so the Burkites will get to the bottom of this. -G- Mike