SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Harmond who wrote (57859)5/21/1999 9:38:00 PM
From: H James Morris  Respond to of 164684
 
William, Aol peaked @ 175. Now, we know that you weren't buying @ 175.
It's just that you like to hype it. In 1 liners that is.;-))
Ps
Have you ever heard of the guy that liked to lead the lambs to slaughter?? I won't do that, but have you seen my Cmnt?? 10k long shares @ 10. Its almost as good as Marks Cust!!
Ps
Bring us something new, your core holdings are looking down.:-(((



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (57859)5/21/1999 11:34:00 PM
From: MSI  Respond to of 164684
 
That's true...and you would have also missed AOL's entire run to date

Agreed. I kept buying MSFT over the years because I know first hand how difficult it is to build and sell an operating system, plus I could see $$ earned every quarter that were incredible. But never invested in AOL, even after starting an ISP, because it looked too little value-add.

What did I know? I would have done 10X in AOL this past year and a half instead of 3X. That's mo mo, and it only pays off when you sell, and you can't hold too long.



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (57859)5/22/1999 8:52:00 AM
From: tonyt  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 164684
 
>That's true...and you would have also missed AOL's entire run to date.

Good point, but the problem is he was talking about AMZN, not AOL -- easy mistake, they both begin with an 'A' ;o)