Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : NP Energy Cp New -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J. Williams who wrote (17483)	5/22/1999 9:29:00 AM
From: Richard Chowning	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 22810

I have been gone from this tread for about two years because of the problem with cost of IP connection from Benin were I have been for that time. When I returned, J. Nelson was one of the few names I recognized. As Williams says, J. Nelson was one of the best and most consistant DD and research people on this tread. The struggle that share holders have gone through to get information from NPEC management has been extreme. The management's communication has been dishonest at times and completely silent at others. Jim is right on target with his call for REAL financials from the company. That is not bashing, it is simply a call for what all share holders should expect. I still hold a large number of shares I have had for over two years, but I have real problem with the communication and discommunication from the company and especially from Dave D. IMHO, Dave D. is not to be trusted. Just look back on the old thread and you will see why we who have been around do not hold much stock in him, but do hold stock in the company. --- Richard

To: J. Williams who wrote (17483)	5/22/1999 5:26:00 PM
From: rhr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22810

I respect your response also. I have only been invested for a year, so I don't know all the past. Certainly, the company has changed from 96-98 quite a bit. Some of the past baggage may be tainting current discourse. The thread would be better served by more discussion of the company, rather than attacks on Meade and her responses to the attackers. If she posts a prediction or some "company" provided DD, then all I ask is for people to disagree or challenge or discuss. Or ignore. Why attack her? Its a waste of time.