Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : American International Petroleum Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Razorbak who wrote (10274)	5/21/1999 11:44:00 PM
From: DEER HUNTER	Respond to of 11888

now you know what I meant when I said "I do believe...and I've said this before...that the stock will rise again.....like a phoenix it will..... I believe this cause this company .....despite all its detractions has exhibited the uncanny ability to survive .... week after week...month after month.....year after.....well.....you get the picture.."...... which answers your question " Will this company ever die, or will it simply issue more stock?"....... dear deer~

To: Razorbak who wrote (10274)	5/22/1999 10:29:00 AM
From: Ray	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 11888

Razor: "Seriously, though, I expect proposals 3 through 5 will pass without much problem because hardly any public company ever gets a majority of proxies back, much less a majority voting "against" company proposals. Furthermore, all proxies that are not returned get automatically counted as votes "FOR" the proposals." (caps added) From DH's post 10270 quoting the SHM filing (caps added): <Approval of this amendment to the Articles of Incorporation requires approval by a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote thereon. As a result, any shares not voted (whether by abstention,broker non-vote or otherwise) will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal.> Hey, Razor - and all the other bashers - why don't you get genuinely serious and truthful and admit that neither you, nor I, nor anyone posting here, now has anything like a reasonably informed understanding of the actual purpose(s) of the authorized stock increase proposal. Too much to ask? We will probably know a lot more before the SH meeting about the reasons for the stock increase proposal, so I do not intend to jump to any conclusions yet - I wouldn't think of submitting you to such irritating nonsense.