Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JMD who wrote (30572)	5/22/1999 12:21:00 AM
From: Ruffian	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

After A Week Like This, Still A "BUY"> 1 Year Chart \| 3 Month Chart Weekly Second Opinion - QCOM 05/24/99 Symbol: QCOM Name: QUALCOMM Exchange: NMS PRICE ANALYSIS Wk. Close 100.31 Wk. Open 110.38 Wk. High 112.00 Wk. Low 98.00 Wk. Change -11.69 YrHigh 119.75 YrLow 18.88 Mo Chg (%) 5.1 Resistance N/A Support N/A SELL STOP 61.00 Volatility (%) 7 Position 28 ADXR 41 OPINION C-Rate 0.0 LONG 02/22/99 32.44 VOLUME ANALYSIS Ave Daily Vol 47586 Mo Chg (%) -51.8 * U/D 1.7 Slope UP Obv BL Pos Obv BL Neg Obv BR * MFI 46 Slope DOWN TECHNICAL ANALYSIS Alpha 0.49 Beta 1.71 MACD-ST BR * MACD-LT BL 50-Day R.S. 2.43 10-Day M.A. DOWN 93 21-Day M.A. UP 95 50-Day M.A. UP 125 200-Day M.A. UP 244 STO(Slow %K) 23 STO(Fast %K) 16 Wilders-RSI 44 OBOS 2 Bollinger Bands 22 RSV 98 POWER RATING 113 SCORE = 0 COMMENT Moving Average Convergence/Divergence (MACD) indicates a BULLISH TREND Chart pattern indicates a STRONG UPWARD TREND Relative Strength is BULLISH Up/Down volume pattern indicates that the stock is under ACCUMULATION The 50 day MOVING AVERAGE is rising which is BULLISH The 200 day MOVING AVERAGE is rising which is BULLISH RECOMMENDATION STOCK IS A BUY MarketEdge & Second Opinion are neither offers to sell nor solictations of offers to buy any security. See User Agreement for other disclaimers.

To: JMD who wrote (30572)	5/22/1999 1:27:00 AM
From: Peter J Hudson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Mike, For a guy that attended U.C. Berserkly in the 60s, you sure are intolerant of differing views. Chuckj has always provided thoughtful commentary to the Q thread. In the interest of balance, here is Chucky's last post. I think you and Maurice have scared him off. YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED!! Jim, I miss him too. o: +Maurice Winn (25934 ) From: +chuckj Saturday, Apr 3 1999 7:03AM ET Reply # of 30573 Goodness, I had to pull out the dictionary to read your meaningless comments. Don't get over enthused about QCOM. These turkey's could not make a phone profitably if it was handed to them for free, by the Chinese. QCOM's government (U.S.) sponsored stream of royalties is what keeping them alive (forced spectrum allocation is the only reason they are making any royalty in this country). The only reason Ericson gave in and got into CDMA is the desperate campaign by the Clinton Mob to save CDMA and leave a legacy of swords to plawshares (probably in exchange for campaign contributions) for the broadband defense communication technology. Despite all of rhetoric statements on CDMA adoption by China, the Chinese with all of the ties to the Clinton Mob, showed their patriotism, unlike what we lack in our leadership, and did not commit to CDMA and are also going to adopt GSM. With the lack of reliability on power management and funky utilization of the Shannon formula on capacity (base level noise increases as the number of users increase, QCOM's only bet is that it does not increase that much, and they don't even know how much), there will not be a large investment in CDMA in China, even at that all of the base stations will be done by either Lucent or Motorola, who are the legitimate telecom outfits. This is just a pop for this stock and you will see a 50% decline when the truth settles in with all of the new buyers. I neither own or short this QCOM, I do not approve of government sponsored businesses and at that by a crooked government. cj Next Previous