Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : HAUP - Hauppauge Digital -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hoffy who wrote (507)	5/22/1999 6:17:00 PM
From: doormouse	Respond to of 1149

hoffy,,, stick to Tokyo Joe's thread. Your recent posts share two consistencies: 1) being wrong 2) repeating the same small vocabulary Your posts this week, as can be read by anyone who clicks on your profile: IATV ("going to soar tomorrow!" -) - WRONG...! KELL ("KELL could be explosive [..deletia..] I bet we get a very nice squeeze"), --- WRONG... ! Their one week chart needs Viagra. AGRS ("a prediction. It opens at .25. Dips fast to .20 and then goes back up to close around .30. Then we'll see it get near .50 by Thursday and then the big spike comes friday. Of course it could open and head straight up. The float is low enough and there won't be many sellers") --- closed down 17% to 29 cents) LAKO ("LAKO is looking very good for a run into the close and a gapper. Recent news looks great. Volume is crazy today. People are noticing it today. SHould run into monday. Looking for 1 or more.") ) - down 8% to 26 cents... CURT ("Is going to fly once a little buying comes in. A lot of people didn't see the news yet as it only came out an hour ago. ONce they come back from lunch and read it the stock will fly. ALso expect a gap up tomorrow on it. Very low float will make it go fast once buying starts.") I didn't see the point in going back any further,,, see what I mean? How much money did you lose on your proclamations this week,,, or do you forestall losses by only making proclamations...? (A good idea!) You claim to be an EE. You seem to think you're operating with a triple-conversion super heterodyne with a 10 degree GaAsFET front end --- WRONG...! I'd say you're viewing the world through a crystal radio that needs to be wound on a new oatmeal box. Yawn... have a nice weekend in the ozone!

To: hoffy who wrote (507)	5/22/1999 6:54:00 PM
From: Chris land	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1149

Hoffy, Does this sound familiar? <<IATV going to soar tomorrow.>>> This is what you posted on 13 May after a close of 15 15/16. Same industry? It closed yesterday at 15 9/16. And now you have the nerve to hype HAUP? If the industry is so great then how come more people are not sharing your optimism? Chris

To: hoffy who wrote (507)	5/22/1999 8:00:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1149

hoffy slow down on the "hype", the growth has been in the 30% to 40% and as a matter of fact the recent swoon from $12 to $8'ich was because of two sequential quarters with no growth at all, of course, the first quarter of the year is always "so so" in this segment. Zeev

To: hoffy who wrote (507)	5/22/1999 10:22:00 PM
From: Buoy12	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1149

Just sell for your profit Hoffy.

To: hoffy who wrote (507)	5/22/1999 10:28:00 PM
From: Chris land	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1149

Hoffy, Do you read Form 10-Q's? If so then I'm sure you read their latest: On October 6, 1998, HCW received notice that AII had commenced an action against it and multiple other defendants in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging that the certain of HCW's products infringe on certain patent rights allegedly owned by the plaintiff. The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory and statutory damages with interest. HCW denies such allegations and intends to vigorously defend this action. On December 22, 1998, HCW filed its Answer the "Answer"). Among other things, pursuant to the Answer, HCW denies that its products infringe AII's patent rights and asserts certain affirmative defenses, including challenging the validity of the Patent. Notwithstanding the foregoing, because of the uncertainties of litigation, no assurances can be given as to the outcome of the AII litigation. In the event that HCW were not to prevail in this litigation, HCW could be required to pay significant damages to AII and could be enjoined from further use of such technology as it presently exists. Although a negative outcome in the AII litigation would have a material adverse affect on HCW, including, but not limited to, its operations and financial condition, HCW believes that, if it is held that HCW's products infringe AII's patent rights, HCW would attempt to design components to replace the infringing components or would attempt to negotiate with AII to utilize its system, although no assurances can be given that HCW would be successful in these attempts. At the present time, HCW can not assess the possible cost of designing and implementing a new system or obtaining rights from AII. As of March 31, 1999, the Company estimated that legal fees incurred were approximately $50,000. news.stockmaster.com Bottom line, Litigation spells risk. Chris