Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (60376)	5/22/1999 7:52:00 PM
From: Sam	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

MB, <<However, what is new is the hint that not all is well with the reported unemployment numbers.>> Can you elaborate on this a little? What are the details alleged to be "not well"? Tia, s.

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (60376)	5/22/1999 10:08:00 PM
From: AHale	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Thanks for the review. Is this a subscription service? If so, can anyone subscribe and how much $? Thanks.

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (60376)	5/25/1999 1:06:00 PM
From: Earlie	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 132070

MB: Thanks for the nice comments. They're appreciated. This one sure kept me out of the pool halls. It has also kept me away from the thread this last three weeks, so this P.M., I'll do a bit of back reading and get started on catching up with the many PMs and notes.(g) Who the heck is this Brian Kerecz? I recall the AMAT note more or less as you commented. My memory is that it was about a year ago. As I recall, it, the "order" from their own plant represented most of that particular quarter's total back order position. The remainder was from a single Taiwan shop. Best, Earlie