SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : XSNI - X-Stream Network -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ciVic who wrote (827)5/22/1999 8:58:00 PM
From: Jacalyn Deaner  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3519
 
ciV - I do consider it, however, his past posts of last week when he was jumping for joy and posting all kinds of "boy am I glad to be on this bandwagon" stuff is a little much considering his latest attempt at "digging" up stuff. If he could find relevant, recent information on the present management - now that will be dirt digging and welcome; for example - if he can find and post (link directly) the connection between the past management - ie their influence on present management, if he can find an alternative source that is in direct conflict with what the present management released on Feb 1, 1999; so far UPTICK has divulged information that is not relevant to the proactive NEW team.

I am not picking on him - I would welcome all information on this issue - however, it should be timely and relevant to what is happening TODAY and considering how gung ho he was last week posting and plastering circumstantial positive posts, he has gone bipolar in his posts to the opposite extreme.

I know there are risks with this issue, but none that are not existant in other issues; and the rewards appear to be worth the minimal risk at this point. Until I see something concrete to alert me otherwise, I shall not be deterred.

UPTICK should investigate the past of the present people in management - that is DD and substantive dirt digging that will have an evaluative effect on many holders of this issue.

Just my opinion. :) Jacalyn



To: ciVic who wrote (827)5/22/1999 9:26:00 PM
From: Terp  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3519
 
Yes, I can disagree when it comes to shorts who twist facts. I am not saying UPTICK is twisting any of the news he posted, but it is just the way he shows up and presents it. I have seen UPTICK's work before and I believe he is a vicious short. Don't get me wrong, I don't mind people who short stocks, it is the way some of them post to distort things.